首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Grasp or brush for biliary sampling at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? A blinded randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Grasp or brush for biliary sampling at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? A blinded randomized controlled trial.

机译:内窥镜逆行胆道造影时要抓胆或刷胆?一项盲法随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Brushing, the standard sampling method at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), lacks sensitivity for cancer detection. We assessed a novel sampling method using a grasping basket. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with a suspected malignant biliary stricture were randomized to biliary sampling at ERC using a basket (basket group, N = 30) or a brush (brush group, N = 26), followed by the alternate device. When deemed necessary, strictures were dilated (using 6-mm balloons exclusively). The primary end point was sensitivity for cancer detection at cytopathological examination of the first sample collected in each patient; the cytopathologist was blinded to clinical details and sampling method. All analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: All 56 patients had successful sampling with both techniques; 50 (89%) had a final diagnosis of malignant stricture. Sensitivity for cancer detection with the first sample collected in each patient was significantly higher in the basket compared to brush group (20/25 [80%]vs 12/25 [48%], respectively, P= 0.018, OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.24-15.21). Seventeen (34%) of the 50 sample pairs collected from malignant cases showed discordant cytopathological results: 15 patients had a positive basket and a negative brush result while two had the inverse association (P= 0.002, OR 7.5, 95% CI 1.65-47.44). Basketting more frequently yielded positive samples from malignant strictures in case of presampling balloon dilation (27/32 [84%]vs 10/18 [56%], respectively, P= 0.043, OR 4.32, 95% CI 1.14-16.37). Specificity was 100% (both methods). CONCLUSION: Biliary sampling at ERC using a dedicated basket provided a significantly higher sensitivity for cancer detection than brushing; presampling stricture dilation significantly increased sensitivity.
机译:目的:内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)的标准采样方法是刷牙,缺乏对癌症检测的敏感性。我们使用抓篮评估了一种新颖的采样方法。方法:将56例疑似恶性胆道狭窄的患者在ERC时随机使用篮子(篮子组,N = 30)或刷子(刷子组,N = 26),然后使用备用装置进行胆道采样。当认为必要时,扩张狭窄(仅使用6毫米气球)。主要终点是在每个患者中收集的第一个样品的细胞病理学检查中检测癌症的敏感性;细胞病理学家对临床细节和取样方法不了解。所有分析均遵循意向性治疗原则。结果:全部56例患者均成功使用这两种技术进行了采样。 50名(89%)最终诊断出恶性狭窄。与刷子组相比,在篮子中每位患者采集的第一份样品的癌症检测灵敏度显着更高(分别为20/25 [80%] vs 12/25 [48%],P = 0.018,OR 4.33、95% CI 1.24-15.21)。从恶性病例中收集的50对样本中,有17例(34%)表现出不一致的细胞病理学结果:15例患者的阳性结果与刷检结果阴性,而2例患者的结果则相反(P = 0.002,或7.5,95%CI 1.65-47.44 )。在预先采样球囊扩张的情况下,上篮更频繁地从恶性狭窄中获得阳性样本(分别为27/32 [84%]对10/18 [56%],P = 0.043或OR 4.32,95%CI 1.14-16.37)。特异性为100%(两种方法)。结论:使用专用篮在ERC进行胆道采样比涂刷提供了更高的癌症检测灵敏度。预采样狭窄扩张明显提高了敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号