...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Ethanol-based fixation is superior to conventional brush cytology in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
【24h】

Ethanol-based fixation is superior to conventional brush cytology in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

机译:基于乙醇的固定优于通过内窥镜逆行胆管造影评估了常规刷子细胞学中的不确定胆道狭窄

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of conventional cytology (CC) with ethanol-based fixation, a cytological analysis using an ethanol based fixative system including a cell block procedure (EBF) to evaluate indeterminate biliary strictures (IBStr). We also compared additionally taken fluorescence-guided forceps biopsies (FB) with EBF concerning a potential additive diagnostic benefit. Early detection and accurate diagnosis are crucial for patients with suspected carcinoma within the biliary tree to preserve curative treatment options but diagnostics and patient care in the evaluation of IBStr are still challenging. ERC-guided brush cytology is the gold standard of nonsurgical evaluation of IBStr. However, accuracy is generally low. New specimen processing's are needed to higher the diagnostic yield in the evaluation of IBStr. We performed a retrospective evaluation in 404 patients referred for further diagnosis of IBStr. Gold standard was defined as surgically obtained histology or patient follow-up of at least 1 year to diagnose or exclude malignancy. Three hundred thirty-four patients were included into the final analysis. One hundred seventy-two strictures were malignant, 162 strictures benign. One hundred seventeen specimens were evaluated by CC, 217 processed by EBF. EBF performed significantly better in terms of sensitivity (24.6% vs 60%, P .001) and accuracy (59.0% vs 75.1%, P = .006). Fifty-eight FB were additionally taken and showed a numerically improved sensitivity compared to EBF alone (80% vs 62.9%, P = .19). EBF is a simple and inexpensive technique that substantially improved sensitivity and accuracy in the evaluation of IBStr. FB specimen did not significantly improve diagnostic yield.
机译:本研究的目的是将常规细胞学(CC)与基于乙醇的固定的诊断产率进行比较,使用包括细胞嵌段程序(EBF)的乙醇基础固定系统进行细胞学分析,以评估不确定的胆道狭窄(IBSTR)。我们还将荧光引导的钳子活组织检查(FB)与EBF进行了比较,关于潜在的添加剂诊断益处。早期检测和准确的诊断对于胆道树内的疑似癌患者至关重要,以保持治疗方法,但在IBSTR评估中诊断和患者护理仍然具有挑战性。 ERC引导的刷子细胞学是IBSTR的非静电评价的金标准。但是,精度通常很低。需要新的样品处理来提高IBSTR评估中的诊断产量。我们在404名患者中进行了回顾性评估,提到了IBSTR的进一步诊断。黄金标准被定义为手术获得的组织学或患者的后续至少1年才能诊断或排除恶性肿瘤。将三百三十四名患者纳入最终分析。一百七十两条狭窄是恶性的,162个狭窄良性。通过EBF处理的CC,217评估一百十七个标本。 EBF在灵敏度方面显着更好(24.6%VS 60%,P <.001)和精度(59.0%与75.1%,P = .006)。另外拍摄58个FB,与单独的EBF相比,表现出数值提高的敏感性(80%vs 62.9%,p = .19)。 EBF是一种简单且廉价的技术,可在IBSTR评估中显着提高了灵敏度和准确性。 FB标本没有显着提高诊断产量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号