...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:导线引导插管技术能否提高胆管插管率并预防ERCP后胰腺炎?:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The most common technique used to achieve primary deep biliary cannulation is the standard contrast-assisted method. To increase the success rate and reduce the risk of complications, a wire-guided cannulation strategy has been proposed. Prospective studies provided conflicting results as to whether the wire-guided cannulation technique increases the cannulation rate and reduces post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis risk compared with the standard method. The objective of this study was to carry out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compares primary biliary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique. METHODS: Literature searches of electronic databases and online clinical trial registers up to March 2009 were conducted to identify RCTs comparing primary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique. A meta-analysis of these clinical trials was performed. RESULTS: Five RCTs were included. Overall, the primary cannulation rates reported with the wire-guided cannulation technique and the standard method were 85.3 and 74.9%, respectively. The pooled analysis of all the selected studies comparing the wire-guided cannulation technique with the standard method yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 2.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-3.31). The pooled analysis comparing the post-ERCP pancreatitis rates for the wire-guided-cannulation groups with those for the standard-method groups yielded an OR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that the wire-guided technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the standard contrast-injection method. Further large, well-performed, randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
机译:目的:用于实现原发性深部胆道插管的最常用技术是标准的造影剂辅助方法。为了提高成功率并减少并发症的风险,提出了一种线引导的插管策略。与标准方法相比,导线引导插管技术是否能提高插管率并降低内镜后逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎的风险,前瞻性研究提供了矛盾的结果。这项研究的目的是进行一项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以线引导方法和标准插管技术比较原发性胆管插管和ERCP后胰腺炎的发生率。方法:对截至2009年3月的电子数据库和在线临床试验注册资料进行文献检索,以鉴定采用线引导方法和标准插管技术比较原发性插管和ERCP后胰腺炎发生率的RCT。对这些临床试验进行了荟萃分析。结果:包括五个随机对照试验。总体而言,线材引导插管技术和标准方法报告的主要插管率分别为85.3%和74.9%。对所有选定研究的汇总分析,将导线引导插管技术与标准方法进行了比较,得出比值比(OR)为2.05(95%置信区间(CI):1.27-3.31)。汇总分析比较了线引导套管组与标准方法组的ERCP后胰腺炎发生率,得出OR值为0.23(95%CI:0.13-0.41)。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,与标准的对比注射方法相比,线引导技术可提高原发性插管率并降低发生ERCP后胰腺炎的风险。需要进一步的大型,性能良好的随机对照研究来证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号