...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of orthopedics >Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.
【24h】

Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.

机译:股骨转子间骨折的计算机体层摄影术:观察者和观察者间的变异性和预后价值的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the level of interobserver and intraobserver agreement among orthopedic surgeons and radiologists when computed tomography (CT) scans are used with plain radiographs to evaluate intertrochanteric fractures. In addition, the prognostic value of current classifications systems concerning quality of life was evaluated. Sixty-one patients who presented with intertrochanteric fractures received open reduction and internal fixation with compression hip screw. Three orthopedic surgeons and 2 radiologists independently classified the fractures according to 2 systems: Evans-Jensen and AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteo-synthesefragen). Fractures were initially graded with plain radiographs and then again in conjunction with CT. Results were analyzed using the (kappa) kappa coefficient. The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey was administered at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year, and results were correlated with fracture grade. Mean kappa coefficients when comparing radiography alone with radiography and CT scan were 0.63 for the AO system and 0.59 for the Evans-Jensen system. Both represent "fair" agreements. Mean overall interobserver kappa coefficients were 0.67 for radiologists and 0.57 for orthopedic surgeons. Radiologists also had higher intraobserver kappa coefficients. No significant relationships were found between follow-up Short Form Health Survey results and intraoperative grading of fractures. When these classification schemes are compared, interobserver agreement does not appear to change dramatically when information from CT scans is added. This may suggest that (1) more data have been provided by CT with greater possibilities for misinterpretation and (2) these classification schemes may not be comprehensive in describing fracture pattern and displacement. Finally, both systems failed to provide any prognostic value.
机译:这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定在将计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描与X射线平片一起使用以评估股骨转子间骨折时,骨科医生和放射科医生之间的观察者之间和观察者内部协议的水平。此外,评估了有关生活质量的当前分类系统的预后价值。发生股骨粗隆间骨折的61例患者行切开复位加压髋螺钉内固定。三名整形外科医生和两名放射科医师根据2个系统分别对骨折进行了分类:Evans-Jensen和AO(骨合成术)。骨折首先用X射线平片进行分级,然后再用CT进行分级。使用(kappa)κ系数分析结果。在基线,3个月和1年进行了36个项目的简短健康调查,其结果与骨折等级相关。当将放射线照相与放射线照相和CT扫描进行比较时,平均κ系数对于AO系统为0.63,对于Evans-Jensen系统为0.59。两者都代表“公平”协议。放射科医生的平均总体观察者卡伯系数为0.67,而骨科医生的平均卡伯系数为0.57。放射科医生的观察者内κ系数也更高。随访简明健康调查结果与术中骨折分级之间无显着相关性。当比较这些分类方案时,添加CT扫描的信息后,观察者间的共识似乎并没有发生很大变化。这可能表明(1)CT提供了更多的数据,但有更多的可能会造成误解;(2)这些分类方案在描述裂缝类型和位移方面可能并不全面。最后,两个系统均未能提供任何预后价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号