...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Medicine >Initiation of allopurinol at first medical contact for acute attacks of gout: A randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Initiation of allopurinol at first medical contact for acute attacks of gout: A randomized clinical trial

机译:初次接触痛风急性发作时的别嘌醇:一项随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Streamlining the initiation of allopurinol could result in a cost benefit for a common medical problem and obviate the perception that no treatment is required once acute attacks have resolved. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in patient daily pain or subsequent attacks with early versus delayed initiation of allopurinol for an acute gout attack. Methods: A total of 57 men with crystal-proven gout were randomized to allopurinol 300 mg daily or matching placebo for 10 days. All subjects received indomethacin 50 mg 3 times per day for 10 days, a prophylactic dose of colchicine 0.6 mg 2 times per day for 90 days, and open-label allopurinol starting at day 11. Primary outcome measures were pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) for the primary joint on days 1 to 10 and self-reported flares in any joint through day 30. Results: On the basis of 51 evaluable subjects (allopurinol in 26, placebo in 25), mean daily VAS pain scores did not differ significantly between study groups at any point between days 1 and 10. Initial VAS pain scores for allopurinol and placebo arms were 6.72 versus 6.28 (P =.37), declining to 0.18 versus 0.27 (P =.54) at day 10, with neither group consistently having more daily pain. Subsequent flares occurred in 2 subjects taking allopurinol and 3 subjects taking placebo (P =.60). Although urate levels decreased rapidly in the allopurinol group (from 7.8 mg/dL at baseline to 5.9 mg/dL at day 3), sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels did not differ between groups at any point. Conclusions: Allopurinol initiation during an acute gout attack caused no significant difference in daily pain, recurrent flares, or inflammatory markers.
机译:目的:简化别嘌醇的起始使用可能会导致常见医学问题的成本效益,并消除人们对一旦急性发作解决就不需要治疗的看法。我们的目标是检验以下假设,即对于急性痛风发作,患者每天的疼痛或随后发作与别嘌呤醇的早期发作和延迟发作之间没有差异。方法:将57名经晶体验证的痛风的男性随机分为每天300 mg别嘌醇或与之匹配的安慰剂治疗10天。所有受试者均接受消炎痛50 mg每天3次,共10天,预防剂量的秋水仙碱0.6 mg,每天2次,共90天,并从第11天开始使用开放标签的别嘌呤醇。主要预后指标为视觉类似物评分(VAS)疼痛)在第1天到第10天进行初次关节治疗,并在第30天之前在任何关节进行自我报告的耀斑。结果:根据51位可评估的受试者(26%的allopurinol,25位的安慰剂),VAS的每日平均疼痛评分无明显差异研究组之间在第1天到第10天之间的任意时间进行比较。别嘌呤醇和安慰剂组的初始VAS疼痛评分为6.72对6.28(P = .37),在第10天下降至0.18对0.27(P = .54),两组均无持续有更多的日常疼痛。随后的发作发生在2名服用别嘌醇的受试者和3名服用安慰剂的受试者中(P = .60)。尽管别嘌呤醇组尿酸水平迅速降低(从基线时的7.8 mg / dL降至第3天的5.9 mg / dL),但两组之间的沉降速率和C反应蛋白水平在任何时候都没有差异。结论:在急性痛风发作期间起始别嘌呤醇在每日疼痛,复发性发作或炎症标志物方面无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号