...
首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Integrating practice-based learning and improvement into medical student learning: evaluating complex curricular innovations.
【24h】

Integrating practice-based learning and improvement into medical student learning: evaluating complex curricular innovations.

机译:将基于实践的学习和改进整合到医学生的学习中:评估复杂的课程创新。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Because practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) is a core competency for residents, the fundamentals of PBLI should be developed in medical school. PURPOSE: Evaluate the effects of a PBLI module for 1st-year students at Dartmouth Medical School in 2004-05. METHODS: Design. Randomized two-group trial (early and late intervention). Intervention. One half of students received the standard curriculum--reviewing student-patient-preceptor reports with their small-group facilitator and student colleagues. The other half received the PBLI-DMEDS module--reviewing student-patient-preceptor reports and applying PBLI methods to history and physical exam skills. ANALYSIS: The module was assessed on (a) core learning of PBLI (pre- and postmodule); (b) student self-assessed proficiency in PBLI (pre- and postmodule); (c) student, faculty, and course leaders' satisfaction; and (d) time costs. RESULTS: Pretest PBLI knowledge scores were similar in both groups; intervention students scored significantly higher after the PBLI-DMEDS module. satisfaction of students, faculty, and course leaders was mixed. the time cost required to implement the module was excessive. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention effectively taught the basics of PBLI but did not integrate well into the core curriculum. Our multifaceted evaluation approach allowed us to amplify aspects of the intervention that worked well and discard those that did not.
机译:背景:由于基于实践的学习与改善(PBLI)是居民的一项核心能力,因此PBLI的基础知识应在医学院中发展。目的:在2004-05年度为达特茅斯医学院的一年级学生评估PBLI模块的效果。方法:设计。随机两组研究(早期和晚期干预)。介入。一半的学生接受了标准课程-与小组辅导员和学生同事一起审查学生-患者-感受者报告。另一半接收了PBLI-DMEDS模块-审查学生-患者-受体报告并将PBLI方法应用于历史和体检技能。分析:对以下模块进行了评估:(a)PBLI的核心学习(模块前和模块后); (b)学生对PBLI的自我评估能力(模块前和模块后); (c)学生,教职员工和课程负责人的满意度; (d)时间成本。结果:两组的预测试PBLI知识得分相似; PBLI-DMEDS模块后,干预学生的得分明显更高。学生,教职员工和课程负责人的满意度好坏参半。实施该模块所需的时间成本过高。结论:干预措施有效地教授了PBLI的基础知识,但没有很好地融入核心课程。我们的多方面评估方法使我们能够放大效果良好的干预措施的各个方面,而舍弃那些效果不佳的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号