首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis: role of magnetic resonance urography and noncontrast computed tomography.
【24h】

Diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis: role of magnetic resonance urography and noncontrast computed tomography.

机译:非钙化性肾积水的诊断:磁共振尿路造影和非对比计算机断层扫描的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) in the diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis when excretory urography (intravenous urography) is either contraindicated or inconclusive. METHODS: A total 108 consecutive patients with noncalcareous hydronephrosis were included in this study. In all patients, intravenous urography was either contraindicated or could not determine the diagnosis. In all patients, calculus obstruction was excluded by NCCT and all underwent heavily T2-weighted MRU. The final definitive diagnosis was established by retrograde or antegrade ureterography, endoscopy, or open surgery and was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of obstruction. Normal kidneys in patients with unilateral obstruction were considered the reference standard for the absence of obstruction. The results of MRU were compared with those of NCCT regarding sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients, 5 had bilateral obstruction and the remaining 103 had unilateral obstruction. Of the latter group, 5 had a solitary kidney; therefore, the total number of renal units was 211 (113 obstructed and 98 normal units). Ureteral strictures were identified by NCCT in 15 (28%) of 54 and by MRU in 45 (83%) of 54 patients. Bladder, ureter, or prostate tumors causing ureteral obstruction could be diagnosed in one half of the 54 patients with such tumors by NCCT (27 of 54) and in all but 2 patients by MRU (52 of 54). Both NCCT and MRU could identify all extraurinary causes of obstruction. Overall, of the 113 kidneys with noncalculus obstruction, the cause could be identified by MRU in 102 (sensitivity of 90%) and by NCCT in 47 (sensitivity of 42%), a difference of statistically significant value in favor of MRU (P <0.001). The specificity of T2-weighted MRU and NCCT was 100% and 99%, respectively (not a statistically significant difference). The overall accuracy of T2-weighted MRU and NCCT was 95% and 68%, respectively (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ureteral obstruction in whom intravenous urography is not helpful and after NCCT has excluded stone disease, heavily T2-weighted MRU is a sensitive and specific method in the identification of the cause of obstruction.
机译:目的:评估排泄性尿路造影(静脉输尿管造影)禁忌或不确定时,磁共振尿路造影(MRU)和非造影计算机断层扫描(NCCT)在非结石性肾积水的诊断中的作用。方法:本研究共纳入108例连续的非钙化性肾积水患者。在所有患者中,禁忌静脉输尿管造影或无法确定诊断。在所有患者中,NCCT排除了结石梗阻,所有患者均接受了重度T2加权的MRU。最终的明确诊断是通过逆行或顺行输尿管造影,内窥镜检查或开放手术建立的,被认为是诊断梗阻的参考标准。单侧梗阻患者的正常肾脏被视为无梗阻的参考标准。将MRU的结果与NCCT的结果进行敏感性,特异性和整体准确性的比较。结果:在108例患者中,有5例患有双侧梗阻,其余103例患有单侧梗阻。在后一组中,有5例患有孤立性肾脏;因此,肾脏单位总数为211个(阻塞的113个单位和98个正常的单位)。通过NCCT在54例患者中有15例(28%)确定了输尿管狭窄,在54例患者中有45例(83%)通过了MRU。可以通过NCCT在54例患有输尿管阻塞的患者中诊断出膀胱,输尿管或前列腺肿瘤的一半(54例中的27例),除MRU以外,在所有2例患者中通过54例(52例)进行诊断。 NCCT和MRU均可识别出所有泌尿外阻塞的原因。总体而言,在113例无牙结石的肾脏中,其原因可以通过MRU在102例中(敏感性为90%)和NCCT在47例中(敏感性为42%)来识别,统计学上的显着性差异有利于MRU(P < 0.001)。 T2加权MRU和NCCT的特异性分别为100%和99%(差异无统计学意义)。 T2加权MRU和NCCT的总体准确度分别为95%和68%(P <0.001)。结论:对于输尿管阻塞的患者,静脉输尿管造影无帮助,并且在NCCT排除了结石疾病后,重度T2加权MRU是识别阻塞原因的灵敏且特异的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号