首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Comparison of computed tomographic urography, magnetic resonance urography and the combination of diffusion weighted imaging in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer
【24h】

Comparison of computed tomographic urography, magnetic resonance urography and the combination of diffusion weighted imaging in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer

机译:计算机体层摄影术,磁共振尿路造影和弥散加权成像在上尿路癌诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To evaluate the performance of computed tomographic urography (CTU), static-fluid magnetic resonance urography (static-fluid MRU) and combinations of CTU, static-fluid MRU and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer. Material and Methods Between January 2010 and June 2011, patients with suspected UUT cancer underwent CTU, static-fluid MRU and DWI (b = 1000 s/mm2) within a 1-week period. The diagnostic performances of CTU, static-fluid MRU and combinations of CTU, static-fluid MRU and DWI for upper urinary tract cancer were prospectively evaluated. The ureteroscopic and histopathologic findings were compared with the imaging findings. Results Compared to static-fluid MRU alone (sensitivity: 76/75%, reader 1/reader 2), combining DWI with MRI can increase the sensitivity (sensitivity: 84/84%, p = 0.031/p = 0.016) of upper urinary tract cancer diagnosis. CTU had greater sensitivity (95/94%) and accuracy (92/91%) than both static-fluid MRU (sensitivity: p 0.001/p 0.001 and accuracy: 83/81%, p = 0.001/p 0.001) and static-fluid MRU with DWI (sensitivity: p = 0.023/p = 0.039 and accuracy: 87/85%, p = 0.042/p = 0.049) for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancers. Compared with CTU alone, CTU with DWI did not significantly increase sensitivity, specificity or accuracy. However, the diagnostic confidence was improved when the combined technique was used (p = 0.031/p = 0.024). Moreover, there was no significant change in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy or diagnostic confidence when static-fluid MRU was used in combination with CTU and DWI. Conclusion Although there is a potential role for static-fluid MRU and static-fluid MRU with DWI in urinary tract imaging, CTU is still the better choice for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer. Combining DWI with CTU can help improve confidence in upper urinary tract cancer diagnoses.
机译:目的评估计算机断层摄影术(CTU),静态流体磁共振尿路造影术(static-fluid MRU)以及CTU,静态流体MRU和弥散加权成像(DWI)的组合在上尿路癌诊断中的性能。材料和方法在2010年1月至2011年6月之间,怀疑UUT癌症的患者在1周内接受了CTU,静液MRU和DWI(b = 1000 s / mm2)。前瞻性评估了CTU,静态MRU以及CTU,静态MRU和DWI的组合对上尿路癌的诊断性能。将输尿管镜检查和组织病理学检查结果与影像学检查结果进行比较。结果与单独使用静态MRU(敏感性:76/75%,阅读器1 /阅读器2)相比,将DWI与MRI结合可以提高上尿的敏感性(敏感性:84/84%,p = 0.031 / p = 0.016)癌症诊断。 CTU的灵敏度(95/94%)和准确度(92/91%)均高于两个静态流体MRU(灵敏度:p <0.001 / p <0.001和准确度:83/81%,p = 0.001 / p <0.001)以及DWI的静态流体MRU(灵敏度:p = 0.023 / p = 0.039,准确度:87/85%,p = 0.042 / p = 0.049),用于诊断上尿路癌。与单独的CTU相比,具有DWI的CTU并未显着提高敏感性,特异性或准确性。但是,当使用组合技术时,诊断的置信度得到了提高(p = 0.031 / p = 0.024)。此外,将静态流体MRU与CTU和DWI结合使用时,敏感性,特异性,准确性或诊断置信度无明显变化。结论尽管静液MRU和带DWI的静液MRU在尿路成像中可能具有潜在作用,但CTU仍然是诊断上尿路癌的更好选择。将DWI与CTU结合使用可以帮助提高对上尿路癌症诊断的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号