首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Practice pattern of urologists in the Rocky Mountains region with regard to use of urodynamic studies.
【24h】

Practice pattern of urologists in the Rocky Mountains region with regard to use of urodynamic studies.

机译:落基山脉地区泌尿科医师在泌尿动力学研究方面的实践模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the patterns of urodynamic studies (UDS) use among community urologists. Much controversy exists with regard to the need and indications for UDS in the clinical evaluation of urinary incontinence (UI) and voiding dysfunction (VD). METHODS: A one-page questionnaire containing 11 questions was mailed to urologists practicing in the Rocky Mountains region. Physicians were asked about (a) their type of practice; (b) the number of patients with UI and VD they see per week; (c) the number of office procedures they perform on these patients; (d) the percentage of patients with UI and VD for whom they use UDS for diagnostic clarification; and (e) the limiting factors to more frequent use of UDS. RESULTS: Of the 127 questionnaires mailed, 51 (40%) were returned, and 49 (39%) of these were returned "completely filled out." No follow-up letter was sent nor was a telephone interview done. Most urologists (n = 38; 76%) indicated they are in private practice, 5 (10%) are in academics, 3 (6%) are in multispeciality groups, 2 (4%) are affiliated with a health maintenance organization (HMO), and 1 is in a hospital-based practice. Twelve (24%) see fewer than 5 UI patients per week, 21 (43%) see 5 to 10 UI patients per week, and 16 (32%) see more than 10 UI patients per week. The respective numbers for VD patients seen per week are 4 (8%), 12 (24%), and 33 (67%). Thirty (61%) and 32 (65%) of respondents use UDS in fewer than 5% of patients seen with UI or VD, respectively. Thirty-seven (76%) use cystoscopy in more than 5% of patients seen with UI or VD. Regarding limiting factors for more frequent use of UDS (of those 35 urologists giving single answers), 60% believed there was a lack of indication and 40% noted that UDS are too time-consuming or not cost-effective (20%), difficult to interpret (5.7%), or that they had no access to such equipment (14%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the majority of urologists perform cystoscopy more frequently than UDS for diagnostic clarification of patients with UI and VD, and 40% of urologists do not perform UDS for reasons other than lack of indication. These results may indicate a need for more access to, and additional training in, UDS among urologists for management of UI and VD.
机译:目的:评估社区泌尿科医师使用尿流动力学研究(UDS)的方式。关于尿失禁(UI)和排尿障碍(VD)的临床评估中对UDS的需求和适应症存在许多争议。方法:将一份包含11个问题的一页调查问卷邮寄给在落基山脉地区执业的泌尿科医师。医师被问及(a)他们的执业类型; (b)每周见到的UI和VD患者人数; (c)他们为这些病人执行的办公室程序数目; (d)使用UDS进行诊断明确的UI和VD患者的百分比; (e)限制使用UDS的限制因素。结果:在寄出的127份问卷中,有51份(占40%)被退回,其中49份(39%)被“完全填写”地归还。没有发送后续信件,也没有进行电话采访。大多数泌尿科医师(n = 38; 76%)表示他们是私人执业,5(10%)是学者,3(6%)是多专业组,2(4%)隶属于健康维持组织(HMO) ),而1是以医院为基础的。每周有十二名(24%)少于5名UI患者; 21名(43%)每周有5至10名UI患者; 16名(32%)每周有10名UI以上患者。每周看到的VD患者的分别为4(8%),12(24%)和33(67%)。 30%(61%)和32(65%)的受访者分别在不到5%的UI或VD患者中使用UDS。在超过5%的UI或VD患者中,有37例(76%)使用了膀胱镜检查。关于UDS频繁使用的限制因素(在这35名泌尿科医师中给出单一答案的情况中),60%的人认为缺乏适应症,40%的人认为UDS太耗时或不合算(20%)口译(5.7%),或者他们无法使用此类设备(14%)。结论:这项研究表明,大多数泌尿科医师比UDS更加频繁地进行膀胱镜检查,以明确UI和VD患者,而40%的泌尿科医师因缺乏适应症以外的其他原因不进行UDS。这些结果可能表明,泌尿科医师需要对UDS进行更多的访问和其他培训,以管理UI和VD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号