首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Intraoperative frozen section analysis of urethral margin biopsies during radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of urethral margin biopsies during radical prostatectomy.

机译:根治性前列腺切除术中尿道边缘活检的术中冰冻切片分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical value of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) on urethral margin (UM) tissue during radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margins increase the risk of post-operative cancer recurrence. Positive surgical margins are frequently found at the apex. The utility of intraoperative FSA of the margins is controversial. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of radical prostatectomy cases (n = 1669) performed at our institution, in which UMs were routinely evaluated by intraoperative FSA. RESULTS: The submitted UM tissue contained cancer glands in 111 cases (6.7%). On FSA, the pathologists detected cancer in 55 cases (3.3%), missed cancer in 38 (2.3%), and reported atypical glands in 18 (1.1%). FSA of the UMs had a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 99.8%, and positive and negative predictive value of 94.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The low sensitivity resulted from a substantial false-negative rate (n = 38), which was largely attributed to limited sampling on FSA (n = 31). Of the 55 patients (3.3%) whose positive UMs were detected by FSA, 20 (1.2%) had cancer-free margins after tissue re-excision. A positive final UM was associated with greater biochemical recurrence (P = .0073). However, the few patients limited the statistical analysis of the benefit of margin conversion through tissue re-excision (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Although experienced pathologists can evaluate the UMs on FSA with good accuracy, FSA has a relatively low sensitivity. Our data have indicated a low yield and a questionable value of routine FSA during radical prostatectomy.
机译:目的:评估前列腺癌根治术中术中冰冻切片分析(FSA)对尿道边缘(UM)组织的准确性和潜在的临床价值。积极的手术切缘增加了术后癌症复发的风险。手术边缘切缘阳性。术中FSA切缘的实用性存在争议。方法:我们回顾了在我们机构进行的一系列连续性前列腺癌根治术病例(n = 1669),其中术中FSA常规评估了UMs。结果:提交的UM组织包含111例癌症腺(6.7%)。在FSA上,病理学家发现55例癌症(3.3%),漏诊癌症38例(2.3%),报告有非典型腺体18例(1.1%)。 UMs的FSA敏感性为59.1%,特异性为99.8%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为94.8%和97.6%。较低的灵敏度是由较高的假阴性率(n = 38)引起的,这在很大程度上归因于FSA的有限采样(n = 31)。通过FSA检测到UM阳性的55名患者(3.3%)中,有20名(1.2%)在组织切除后具有无癌边缘。最终UM阳性与更高的生化复发率相关(P = .0073)。然而,少数患者限制了通过组织切除术进行切缘转换的益处的统计学分析(P = 0.35)。结论:尽管经验丰富的病理学家可以准确评估FSA的UM,但FSA的敏感性相对较低。我们的数据表明前列腺癌根治术中常规FSA的收率低且价值可疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号