首页> 外文期刊>Psychology in the schools >RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY EVIDENCE OF SCORES ON THE ACHIEVEMENT GOAL TENDENCIES QUESTIONNAIRE IN A SAMPLE OF SPANISH STUDENTS OF COMPULSORY SECONDARY EDUCATION
【24h】

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY EVIDENCE OF SCORES ON THE ACHIEVEMENT GOAL TENDENCIES QUESTIONNAIRE IN A SAMPLE OF SPANISH STUDENTS OF COMPULSORY SECONDARY EDUCATION

机译:西班牙初中学生样本中分数对成就目标倾向问卷的信度和效度证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examined the reliability and validity evidence drawn front the scores of the Spanish version of the Achievement Goal Tendencies Questionnaire (AGTQ) using a sample of 2,022 (51.1% boys) Spanish students from grades 7 to 10. Confirmatory factor analysis replicated the correlated three-factor structure of the AGTQ in this sample: Learning Goals (LG). Social Reinforcement Goals (SRG), and Performance Goals (PG). The AGTQ yields relatively reliable scores for Spanish students. Logistic regression analyses were used to provide additional validity evidence of AGTQ scores on academic success (general, Spanish, and mathematics). Results indicated that general academic success was 15% and 5% more likely every time that scores on LG and PG scales increased I point, respectively, although general academic Success Was 9% less likely every time that scores on SRG scale increased I point. These results were similar for Spanish and mathematics. However. the score on the LG scale did not forecast Success in both subjects.
机译:这项研究使用了7至10年级的2,022名(51.1%的男生)西班牙学生作为样本,检验了西班牙语版本的成就目标倾向问卷(AGTQ)得分之前的信度和效度证据。示例中AGTQ的因素结构:学习目标(LG)。社会强化目标(SRG)和绩效目标(PG)。 AGTQ为西班牙学生提供相对可靠的分数。使用逻辑回归分析来提供AGTQ分数在学术成就(普通,西班牙语和数学)方面的其他有效性证据。结果表明,每次在LG和PG量表上的得分提高I点,一般学术成功的可能性分别高出15%和5%,尽管每次在SRG量表上的得分上的得分I升高,一般学术成功的可能性低9%。对于西班牙语和数学,这些结果相似。然而。 LG量表的分数并未预测两个学科的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号