首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: Can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes?
【24h】

Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: Can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes?

机译:关于标准治疗方案和临床试验的交流:我们可以教医生新技能来改善患者预后吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The International Breast Cancer Study Group conducted a phase III trial in Australian/New Zealand (ANZ) and Swiss/German/Austrian (SGA) centres on training doctors in clear and ethical information delivery about treatment options and strategies to encourage shared decision making. Methods Medical, surgical, gynaecological and radiation oncologists, and their patients for whom adjuvant breast cancer therapy was indicated, were eligible. Doctors were randomised to participate in a workshop with standardised teaching material and role playing. Patients were recruited in the experimental and control groups before and after the workshop. Results In ANZ centres, 21 eligible doctors recruited a total of 304 assessable patients. In SGA centres, 41 doctors recruited 390 patients. The training was well accepted. There was no overall effect on patient decisional conflict (primary endpoint) 2 weeks after the consultation. Overall, patients were satisfied with their treatment decision, their consultation and their doctors' consultation skills. Considerable variation was observed in patient outcomes between SGA and ANZ centres; the effect sizes of the intervention were marginal (<0.2). Conclusions Shared decision making remains a challenge. A sustained training effect may require more intensive training tailored to the local setting. Cross-cultural differences need attention in conducting trials on communication interventions.
机译:背景资料国际乳腺癌研究小组在澳大利亚/新西兰(ANZ)和瑞士/德国/奥地利(SGA)中心进​​行了一项III期临床试验,旨在对医生进行清晰,符合道德的信息传递,以指导他们选择治疗方案和策略,以鼓励共同决策。方法内科,外科,妇科和放射肿瘤学家以及需要辅助乳腺癌治疗的患者均符合条件。医生被随机分配到具有标准化教材和角色扮演的工作坊中。研讨会前后,在实验组和对照组中招募患者。结果在ANZ中心,有21位合格的医生共招募了304名可评估患者。在SGA中心,有41名医生招募了390名患者。培训被接受。咨询后2周,对患者的决策冲突(主要终点)没有总体影响。总体而言,患者对他们的治疗决定,咨询和医生的咨询技巧感到满意。在SGA和ANZ中心之间,患者的预后差异很大。干预措施的效果大小很小(<0.2)。结论共同决策仍然是一个挑战。持续的培训效果可能需要针对当地情况进行更深入的培训。在进行交流干预试验时,需要注意跨文化差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号