首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >The use of Mood Disorder Questionnaire, Hypomania Checklist-32 and clinical predictors for screening previously unrecognised bipolar disorder in a general psychiatric setting
【24h】

The use of Mood Disorder Questionnaire, Hypomania Checklist-32 and clinical predictors for screening previously unrecognised bipolar disorder in a general psychiatric setting

机译:使用情绪障碍问卷,Hypomania Checklist-32和临床预测指标筛查以前在一般精神病学中无法识别的躁郁症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bipolar disorder is often unrecognised and misdiagnosed in the general psychiatric setting. This study compared the psychometric properties of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32), examined the clinical predictors of bipolar disorder and determined the best approach for screening previously unrecognised bipolar disorder in a general psychiatric clinic. A random sample of 340 non-psychotic outpatients with no previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder completed the MDQ and HCL-32 during their scheduled clinic visits. Mood and alcohol/substance use disorders were reassessed using a telephone-based Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. We found that the HCL-32 had better psychometric performance and discriminatory capacity than the MDQ. The HCL-32's internal consistency and 4-week test-retest reliability were higher. The area under the curve was also greater than that of the MDQ at various clustering and impairment criteria. The optimal cut-off of the MDQ was co-occurrence of four symptoms with omission of the impairment criterion; for the HCL-32, it was 11 affirmative responses. Multivariable logistic regression found that bipolar family history was associated with an increased risk of bipolar disorder (odds ratio = 4.93). The study showed that simultaneous use of the HCL-32 and bipolar family history was the best approach for detecting previously unrecognised bipolar disorder.
机译:在一般的精神病学背景下,双相情感障碍通常是未被识别和误诊的。这项研究比较了情绪障碍问卷(MDQ)和低躁狂检查表(HCL-32)的心理测量特性,检查了躁郁症的临床预测指标,并确定了在普通精神病诊所筛查先前无法识别的躁郁症的最佳方法。随机抽取了340名先前没有诊断为躁郁症的非精神病门诊患者,在他们计划的门诊就诊期间完成了MDQ和HCL-32。使用基于电话的DSM-IV结构化临床访谈对情绪和酒精/物质使用障碍进行了重新评估。我们发现,HCL-32具有比MDQ更好的心理测验性能和歧视能力。 HCL-32的内部一致性和4周的重新测试可靠性更高。在各种聚类和损伤标准下,曲线下的面积也大于MDQ的面积。 MDQ的最佳临界值是同时出现四个症状,而忽略了损伤标准。对于HCL-32,它是11个肯定的回答。多变量逻辑回归分析发现,双相情感障碍家族史与双相情感障碍风险增加相关(优势比= 4.93)。研究表明,同时使用HCL-32和双相情感障碍家族史是检测先前无法识别的双相情感障碍的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号