首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables
【24h】

Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables

机译:序数变量的探索性和验证性因素分析中的多变量与Pearson相关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Given that the use of Likert scales is increasingly common in the field of social research it is necessary to determine which methodology is the most suitable for analysing the data obtained; although, given the categorization of these scales, the results should be treated as ordinal data it is often the case that they are analysed using techniques designed for cardinal measures. One of the most widely used techniques for studying the construct validity of data is factor analysis, whether exploratory or confirmatory, and this method uses correlation matrices (generally Pearson) to obtain factor solutions. In this context, and by means of simulation studies, we aim to illustrate the advantages of using polychoric rather than Pearson correlations, taking into account that the latter require quantitative variables measured in intervals, and that the relationship between these variables has to be monotonic. The results show that the solutions obtained using polychoric correlations provide a more accurate reproduction of the measurement model used to generate the data.
机译:鉴于在社会研究领域越来越多地使用Likert量表,有必要确定哪种方法最适合分析获得的数据。尽管鉴于这些量表的分类,应将结果视为有序数据,但通常情况下,应使用针对基数测量设计的技术对其进行分析。研究数据构造有效性的最广泛使用的技术之一是因子分析,无论是探索性的还是证实性的,并且该方法使用相关矩阵(通常为Pearson)来获取因子解。在这种情况下,通过仿真研究,我们旨在说明使用多变量相关性而不是皮尔逊相关性的优点,并考虑到后者需要以间隔为单位进行测量的定量变量,并且这些变量之间的关系必须是单调的。结果表明,使用多色相关性获得的解决方案可更准确地再现用于生成数据的测量模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号