首页> 外文期刊>Postharvest Biology and Technology >Recent advances on the use of natural and safe alternatives to conventional methods to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes.
【24h】

Recent advances on the use of natural and safe alternatives to conventional methods to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes.

机译:使用天然,安全的替代品来控制食用葡萄采后灰霉病的最新进展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea, is the main postharvest decay of table grapes. It can develop in the vineyard and spread rapidly among berries after harvest, during long distant transport, cold storage and shelf-life. In conventional agriculture, bunches are sprayed with fungicides after flowering, at pre-bunch closure, at veraison, and later, depending on the time of harvest. Harvested bunches are usually stored in the presence of sulfur dioxide. However, the use of synthetic fungicides and of sulfur dioxide is not allowed on organic grapes and the study of alternative methods to control postharvest decay has developed over several decades, along with the demand for safer storage methods. This review summarizes the results published in the field within the last 5 years (2006-2010). We can group these approaches as follows: (i) biocontrol agents; (ii) natural antimicrobials; (iii) GRAS type decontaminating agents; and (iv) physical means. Two biocontrol agents, Muscodor albus and Hanseniaspora uvarum, have shown equal or better effectiveness than conventional methods to control gray mold of table grapes in laboratory scale experiments. Currently, the bottleneck for the commercial use of biocontrol agents is that the registration process is comparable to that of fungicides, with similar costs but often with a narrower market. This delays their transition from experimental to practical use. Natural antimicrobials, such as salts, chitosan, and plant extracts, have demonstrated good results and often have been applied in various scales. Several GRAS-classified sanitizers have been tested to extend postharvest storage of table grapes, including acetic acid, electrolyzed oxidizing water, ozone, and ethanol. Physical technologies involving variations in temperature, UV-C irradiation, pressure or changing atmospheric composition, are all postharvest practices which require significant adaptation by an industry which is accustomed to minimal intervention during harvest. Overall, the use of ozone and of calcium chloride are two promising examples of treatments that are beginning to be adopted on a commercial scale. The requirements for the optimal treatment of grapes against gray mold before harvest or during storage are summarized. All rights reserved, Elsevier.
机译:灰葡萄孢引起的灰霉病是食用葡萄采后的主要腐烂。它可以在葡萄园中生长,并在收获后,长途运输,冷藏和保质期内迅速在浆果中传播。在常规农业中,视收获时间而定,在开花后,束前关闭,确证以及随后对束束喷洒杀菌剂。收获的串通常存储在二氧化硫的存在下。然而,不允许在有机葡萄上使用合成杀真菌剂和二氧化硫,几十年来,随着对更安全的存储方法的需求,研究了控制采后腐烂的替代方法的研究。这篇综述总结了过去五年(2006-2010年)在该领域发表的结果。我们可以将这些方法归纳如下:(i)生物防治剂; (ii)天然抗菌剂; (iii)GRAS型去污剂; (iv)物理手段。在实验室规模的实验中,两种生物防治剂 Muscodor albus 和 Hanseniaspora uvarum 表现出与常规方法相同或更好的控制食用葡萄灰霉病的功效。当前,生物防治剂的商业使用的瓶颈在于注册过程与杀真菌剂的注册过程可比,其成本相近,但往往市场狭窄。这延迟了它们从实验到实际使用的过渡。天然抗菌剂,例如盐,壳聚糖和植物提取物,已显示出良好的效果,并且经常以各种规模应用。已对几种GRAS分类的消毒剂进行了测试,以延长鲜食葡萄收获后的储存时间,包括乙酸,电解氧化水,臭氧和乙醇。涉及温度,UV-C辐射,压力或大气成分变化的物理技术都是收获后的实践,需要习惯于在收获期间进行最小干预的行业进行重大调整。总体而言,臭氧和氯化钙的使用是开始在商业规模上采用的两个有希望的处理实例。总结了葡萄收获前或贮藏期间对灰霉病葡萄进行最佳处理的要求。保留所有权利,Elsevier。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号