首页> 外文期刊>Psychosis >The relationship between theory of mind and insight in psychosis: Evidence for specificity
【24h】

The relationship between theory of mind and insight in psychosis: Evidence for specificity

机译:心理理论与精神病学见解之间的关系:特异性证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We predicted that mentalizing relates to social aspects of insight in psychosis. Thirty participants experiencing psychosis and presenting poor to moderate insight undertook a false belief picture sequencing task with control sequences. We used an improved scoring system that accounted simultaneously for speed and accuracy of mentalizing. While mentalizing was not significantly related to global insight, "awareness of psychosis", "re-labelling symptoms as abnormal", or "understanding need for treatment", it was positively related to the influence of the opinions of unspecified "others" on insight. Participants were insightful in predicting their doctor's opinion, but this was unrelated to mentalizing. Intact social knowledge about doctors, rather than mentalizing, may be used to understand the doctor's opinion. However, mentalizing is needed to incorporate others' opinions about psychosis into one's own insight, as the perspectives of unspecified "others" would likely vary more than that of medical professionals. The results suggest that medical professionals should be careful to distinguish simple recognition of their views from genuine insight.
机译:我们预测心理化与精神病洞察力的社会方面有关。 30名患有精神病并表现出差到中等见解的参与者使用控制序列进行了错误的信念图片测序任务。我们使用了一种改进的计分系统,该计分系统同时考虑了思维速度和准确性。虽然心理化与总体洞察力,“精神病意识”,“将症状重新标记为异常”或“了解治疗需要”没有显着相关,但与未指明的“其他人”的观点对洞察力的影响呈正相关。参与者对预测医生的见解很有见识,但这与思想化无关。关于医生的完整的社会知识,而不是心理化的知识,可以用来理解医生的意见。但是,需要进行心理思考,以将他人对精神病的观点纳入自己的见解中,因为未指定的“他人”的观点可能会比医学专业人士的观点变化更大。结果表明,医学专业人员应谨慎区分对观点的简单认识与真正的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号