首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >Socio-economic differences in outdoor food advertising in a city in Northern England.
【24h】

Socio-economic differences in outdoor food advertising in a city in Northern England.

机译:英格兰北部某城市户外食品广告的社会经济差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To explore differences in the prevalence of outdoor food advertising, and the type and nutritional content of advertised foods, according to an area-based marker of socio-economic position (SEP) in a city in Northern England. Design. All outdoor advertisements in the city were identified during October-December 2009, their size (in m2) estimated and their location determined using a global positioning system device. Advertisements were classified as food or non-food. Food advertisements were classified into one of six food categories. Information on the nutritional content of advertised foods was obtained from packaging and manufacturer's websites. An area-based marker of SEP was assigned using the location of each advertisement, grouped into three affluence tertiles for analysis. Setting. A city in Northern England. Subjects. None. Results. In all, 1371 advertisements were identified; 211 (15%) of these were for food. The advertisements covered 6765 m2, of which 1326 m2 (20%) was for food. Total advertising and food advertising space was largest in the least affluent tertile. There was little evidence of socio-economic trends in the type or nutritional content of advertised foods. Conclusion. Despite an absence of socio-economic differences in the type and nutritional content of advertised foods, there were socio-economic differences in food advertising space. There may also be socio-economic differences in exposure to outdoor food advertising.
机译:目的。根据英格兰北部某城市的社会经济地位(SEP)基于区域的标记,探讨户外食品广告的流行程度以及所广告食品的类型和营养含量的差异。设计。在2009年10月至12月期间,确定了该城市的所有户外广告,并使用全球定位系统设备估算了它们的大小(以m 2 为单位)。广告分为食品或非食品。食品广告被分为六个食品类别之一。从包装和制造商的网站上可以获得有关广告食品营养成分的信息。使用每个广告的位置分配了SEP的基于区域的标记,分为三个富裕度三分位数,以进行分析。设置。英格兰北部的一个城市。主题。没有。结果。总共确定了1371个广告。其中211(15%)用于食品。广告覆盖了6765 m 2 ,其中1326 m 2 (20%)用于食品。总广告和食品广告空间最大,最不富裕。几乎没有证据表明广告食品的类型或营养含量具有社会经济趋势。结论。尽管在广告食品的类型和营养含量上没有社会经济差异,但食品广告空间仍存在社会经济差异。接触户外食品广告的社会经济差异也可能存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号