首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science in the public interest: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Commentary on The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice
【24h】

Commentary on The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice

机译:《组织培训与发展科学:实践中的重要问题》评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Having worked in business and academia, and consulted in those as well as government, I have seen and experienced training in many forms. I have seen programs sabotaged by managers who wanted employees working instead of learn-ing, an expensive program bought because a competing com-pany used it, training used as a punishment or as a reward, programs adopted without clear objectives in mind, and pro-grams adopted because they "seemed like a good idea." As Bill McGehee and I noted over 50 years ago (McGehee & Thayer, 1961), training is frequently regarded as a "given good." Much has changed since then, but there is still a ten-dency in business, government, and academia to adopt pro-grams based on little more than attractiveness, modishness, or a desire to keep up with others in the field. Salas et al.'s article will help prevent such mistakes.
机译:我曾在商业和学术界工作,并在政府和政府部门咨询过,我已经看到并经历了许多形式的培训。我曾见过一些计划,这些计划遭到经理人的破坏,他们想要员工工作而不是学习;由于竞争对手的公司使用它而购买了昂贵的程序,将其用作惩罚或奖励的培训,在没有明确目标的情况下采用了程序,采用的语法是因为它们“看起来像个好主意”。正如我和Bill McGehee在50多年前所指出的那样(McGehee&Thayer,1961),培训通常被认为是“给定的东西”。从那时起,情况发生了很大变化,但是企业,政府和学术界仍然采取十项措施来采用程序,其目的仅在于吸引力,时髦或与该领域其他人保持同步的愿望。 Salas等人的文章将有助于防止此类错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号