首页> 外文期刊>Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action >Lessons Learned in Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Build a National Diabetes Collaborative in Canada
【24h】

Lessons Learned in Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Build a National Diabetes Collaborative in Canada

机译:在加拿大使用基于社区的参与性研究建立全国糖尿病合作组织的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, the Canadian First Nations Diabetes Clinical Management Epidemiologic (CIRCLE) study documents the current clinical management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and complications in 19 partnering First Nations (FN) communities. Objectives: To outline the lessons learned in developing and fostering community health partnerships, and demonstrate the feasibility of using CBPR in multisile research at a national level. Methods: Investigators developed investigator-FN community partnerships from seven Canadian provinces, and research assistants were hired from each community to facilitate data collection. Research assistants randomly selected patients from each community's diabetes registry, and audited the charts of consenting patients from 2006 to 2009 for diabetes indicators in accordance with national diabetes guidelines. Lessons Learned: Lessons learned in using CBPR on a national scale are outlined by highlighting challenges and facilitating factors associated with (1) building collaborative relationships, (2) culture and ethics, (3) collaboration and partnership, and (4) innovative avenues of data management and dissemination. Lessons learned include the need for a flexible research agenda, clear and mutually agreed upon roles, partnership from all community levels including Elders, regional coordinators managing several sites, and wide-scale dissemination methods. Conclusion: The CIRCLE national CBPR multisite collaborative is unprecedented in Canada, and provides a feasible model for other studies. Using CBPR on a national scale exacerbates challenges commonly faced with single-site or multisite research, but the benefits provided in developing partnerships based on mutual trust and goals makes it of great importance.
机译:背景:加拿大原住民糖尿病临床管理流行病学(CIRCLE)研究使用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)原则,记录了19个伙伴原住民(FN)社区当前的2型糖尿病(T2DM)及其并发症的临床管理。目标:概述在发展和促进社区卫生伙伴关系中汲取的经验教训,并证明在国家一级在多桩研究中使用CBPR的可行性。方法:研究人员从加拿大七个省建立了研究者-FN社区合作伙伴关系,并从每个社区聘用了研究助手以促进数据收集。研究助手从每个社区的糖尿病登记处随机选择患者,并根据国家糖尿病指南对2006年至2009年同意患者的图表进行了糖尿病指标检查。汲取的教训:着重强调与(1)建立合作关系,(2)文化和道德,(3)合作与伙伴关系以及(4)创新途径有关的挑战和促进因素,概述了在全国范围内使用CBPR的经验教训。数据管理和传播。获得的经验教训包括:需要灵活的研究议程,明确且相互商定的角色,包括老年人在内的所有社区级别的伙伴关系,管理多个站点的区域协调员以及广泛的传播方法。结论:加拿大的CIRCLE国家CBPR多站点协作是前所未有的,并为其他研究提供了可行的模型。在全国范围内使用CBPR加剧了单站点或多站点研究通常面临的挑战,但是在基于互信和目标的基础上建立合作伙伴关系所带来的好处使其显得尤为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号