首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.
【24h】

Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.

机译:大肠癌筛查的完整诊断评估:研究设计和基线发现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: While indicated by guidelines, complete diagnostic evaluation, or CDE (i.e., colonoscopy or combined flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema X ray), is often not recommended and performed for persons with an abnormal screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT) result. We initiated a randomized trial to assess the impact of a physician-oriented intervention on CDE rates in primary care practices. METHODS: In 1998, we identified 1,184 primary care physicians (PCPs) in 584 practices whose patients received FOBTs that are mailed annually by a managed care organization screening program. A total of 470 PCPs in 318 practices completed a baseline survey. Practices were randomly assigned either to a Control Group (N = 198) or to an Intervention Group (N = 120). Control Group practices received the screening program. Intervention Group practices received the screening program and the intervention (i.e., CDE reminder-feedback plus educational outreach). Practice CDE recommendation and performance rates are the primary outcomes to be measured in the study. RESULTS: Baseline CDE recommendation and performance rates were low and were comparable in Control and Intervention Group practices (54 to 57% and 39 to 40%, respectively). PCPs in the practices tended to view FOBT screening and CDE favorably, but had concerns about screening efficacy, time involved in CDE, and patient discomfort and adherence. Control Group physicians were more likely than Intervention Group physicians to believe that a mail-out FOBT screening program helps in the practice of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to enroll a high proportion of targeted primary care practices, measure practice characteristics and CDE rates at baseline, and develop and implement the intervention. Study outcome analyses will take into account baseline differences in practice characteristics. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
机译:背景:尽管指南中指出,对于粪便潜血试验(FOBT)筛查结果异常的患者,通常不建议进行完整的诊断评估或CDE(即结肠镜检查或软性乙状结肠镜加钡剂灌肠X线检查)。我们启动了一项随机试验,以评估面向医生的干预措施对初级保健实践中CDE率的影响。方法:在1998年,我们在584个实践中确定了1,184名初级保健医生(PCP),他们的患者接受了FOBT,而这些FOBT是由管理型医疗组织筛查计划每年邮寄的。 318个实践中的470个PCP完成了基线调查。实践被随机分配到对照组(N = 198)或干预组(N = 120)。对照组的做法接受了筛查计划。干预小组的做法接受了筛查计划和干预措施(即CDE提醒反馈加教育宣传)。实践中的CDE建议和绩效率是该研究中要衡量的主要结果。结果:基线CDE推荐率和绩效率较低,在对照组和干预组的实践中可比(分别为54%至57%和39%至40%)。实践中的PCP倾向于对FOBT筛查和CDE持满意态度,但担心筛查的有效性,参与CDE的时间以及患者的不适和依从性。对照组的医生比干预组的医生更有可能相信邮寄FOBT筛查计划有助于医学实践。结论:我们能够招募大量有针对性的初级保健实践,在基线时测量实践特征和CDE率,并制定和实施干预措施。研究结果分析将考虑实践特征的基线差异。版权所有2001美国健康基金会和学术出版社。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号