首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Can sedentary adults accurately recall the intensity of their physical activity?
【24h】

Can sedentary adults accurately recall the intensity of their physical activity?

机译:久坐不动的成年人能否准确回忆自己的运动强度?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Physical activity, in particular vigorous activity (i.e., > or =6 METs), lowers mortality from chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD). The 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (PAR), a self-administered activity log (LOG), and heart rate monitoring (HR) were used to quantify activity patterns among sedentary adults. We hypothesized that individuals in this population could accurately estimate the duration, but not the intensity, of their activity. METHODS: Sedentary adults (n = 94, 47.8 +/- 7.1 years) completed two PARs 1 week apart and underwent HR monitoring while completing a LOG for 1 day during the PAR assessment interval. RESULTS: The relationship between PARs (kcal. kg(-1). day(-1) ) was significant (r = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.87) among individuals (n = 63) reporting "typical" activity patterns and among all individuals (n = 94) reporting "typical" and "not typical" activity patterns combined (r = 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.59). Quantity of moderate activity was greater (P = 0.0001) on PAR and LOG compared to that measured by HR. Quantity of hard (vigorous) activity was also greater (P = 0.019) on LOG compared to that measured by HR. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary adults tend to overestimate the intensity of their activity, specifically for moderate activity. Furthermore, the aerobic capacity of our sedentary adult sample (about 7.3 METs) suggests that the definition of a threshold intensity level of activity necessary to reduce mortality from CVD should be reexamined, because a value of > or =6 METs appears to be too high in this population. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
机译:背景:体育活动,特别是剧烈活动(即≥6METs),降低了慢性疾病如心血管疾病(CVD)的死亡率。使用7天体育锻炼召回(PAR),自我管理的活动日志(LOG)和心率监测(HR)来量化久坐成年人的活动模式。我们假设该人群中的个体可以准确估计其活动的持续时间,而不是活动强度。方法:久坐的成年人(n = 94,47.8 +/- 7.1岁)每隔1周完成两次PAR,并在PAR评估间隔内完成LOG 1天的同时进行HR监测。结果:个体之间的关系(kcal。kg(-1)。day(-1))在报告“典型”活动模式的个体中(n = 63)显着(r = 0.80,95%CI 0.68-0.87)所有报告“典型”和“非典型”活动模式的个体(n = 94)组合在一起(r = 0.44,95%CI 0.26-0.59)。与HR相比,PAR和LOG的中等活动量更大(P = 0.0001)。与HR相比,LOG的坚硬(剧烈)活动量也更大(P = 0.019)。结论:久坐的成年人倾向于高估他们的活动强度,特别是对于中等强度的活动。此外,我们久坐的成年人样本的有氧能力(约7.3 METs)表明,应降低降低CVD死亡率所需的活动阈强度水平的定义,因为METs≥6的值似乎太高在这个人口中。版权所有2001美国健康基金会和学术出版社。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号