...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Why target sedentary adults in primary health care? Baseline results from the Waikato Heart, Health, and Activity Study.
【24h】

Why target sedentary adults in primary health care? Baseline results from the Waikato Heart, Health, and Activity Study.

机译:为什么要针对久坐的成年人进行初级保健?怀卡托心脏,健康与活动研究的基线结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The question of whether the public health issue of physical inactivity should be addressed in primary health care is a controversial matter. METHODS: Baseline cross-sectional analysis of a physician-based physical activity intervention trial involving sedentary adults was undertaken within 42 rural and urban family practices in New Zealand to examine self-reported levels of physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors. A self-administered single question about physical activity was used to screen 40- to 79-year-old patients from waiting rooms for physical inactivity. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the screening question was 81%. Participation rates for the study were high, including 74% of family physicians (n = 117) in the region. Eighty-eight percent of consecutive patients in the age group agreed to be screened and 46% were identified as sedentary. Of those eligible, 66% (n = 878) agreed to participate in a study involving a lifestyle intervention from their family physician. Blood pressure and BMI were significantly greater than that in the general population. There were high rates of hypertension (52%), diabetes (10.5%), obesity (43%), previous cardiovascular disease (19%), and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (93%). Decreasing total energy expenditure was associated with increasing cardiovascular risk (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sedentary adults in primary care represent a high cardiovascular risk population. Screening for inactivity in primary care is effective and efficient. Two-thirds of sedentary adults agreed to receive a lifestyle intervention from their family physician.
机译:背景:在初级卫生保健中是否应解决运动不足的公共卫生问题,这是一个有争议的问题。方法:在新西兰的42个农村和城市家庭实践中,进行了一项以医师为基础的体育锻炼干预试验的基线横断面分析,该试验涉及久坐的成年人,以检查自我报告的体育锻炼水平和心血管危险因素。一个关于身体活动的自我管理的单一问题被用来从候诊室筛查40至79岁的患者缺乏身体活动。结果:筛查问题的阳性预测值为81%。该研究的参与率很高,包括该地区74%的家庭医生(n = 117)。该年龄段连续患者中有88%同意接受筛查,其中46%被确定为久坐患者。在符合条件的人中,有66%(n = 878)同意参加一项由其家庭医生进行的生活方式干预研究。血压和体重指数显着高于普通人群。高血压(52%),糖尿病(10.5%),肥胖(43%),既往心血管疾病(19%)和心血管疾病危险因素(93%)的发生率很高。总能量消耗的减少与心血管风险的增加有关(P = 0.001)。结论:在基层医疗中久坐的成年人代表着高心血管风险人群。筛查基层医疗无活动是有效的。三分之二的久坐的成年人同意接受家庭医生的生活方式干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号