首页> 外文期刊>Perception & psychophysics >Hemispheric differences for the integration of stimulus levels and their contents: Evidence from bilateral presentations
【24h】

Hemispheric differences for the integration of stimulus levels and their contents: Evidence from bilateral presentations

机译:刺激水平及其内容整合的半球差异:来自双边报告的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several studies have demonstrated that hemispheric differences for the processing of hierarchical letter stimuli are more likely to occur when the letters at the levels are associated with conflicting responses. Typically, a single stimulus is presented, so that the conflict occurs between the global and the local levels of the same stimulus. Our hypothesis is that in this situation, conflict resolution requires integration of the letters and their respective levels and that the hemispheres differ in this integration process. According to this integration theory, the favorable effect of response conflict on hemispheric differences should vanish if other features, such as location, can also serve for conflict resolution. This prediction was tested in the present study by simultaneously presenting an individual hierarchical stimulus to each visual field. Conflicting letters either were arranged within one stimulus or were placed in different stimuli. In the latter case, a response conflict could also be resolved by integrating letters and locations. As was expected, there were no visual field effects in these conditions. On the other hand, visual field effects showed up when the conflicting letters were located within the same stimulus. These results support the idea that the hemispheres differ in their capacity for integrating level and form.
机译:多项研究表明,当层次上的字母与冲突的响应相关联时,处理分层字母刺激的半球差异更可能发生。通常,只提供一个刺激,因此在同一刺激的全局和局部级别之间会发生冲突。我们的假设是,在这种情况下,解决冲突需要对字母及其各自的层次进行集成,并且在此集成过程中半球有所不同。根据这种整合理论,如果其他特征(例如位置)也可用于解决冲突,则响应冲突对半球差异的有利影响应消失。通过同时向每个视野呈现单独的分层刺激,在本研究中测试了此预测。冲突的字母要么排列在一个刺激中,要么放置在不同的刺激中。在后一种情况下,也可以通过集成字母和位置来解决响应冲突。如预期的那样,在这些条件下没有视野影响。另一方面,当冲突的字母位于同一刺激中时,会出现视野影响。这些结果支持了半球整合水平和形式的能力不同的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号