首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >An analysis of paramedic verbal reports to physicians in the emergency department trauma room.
【24h】

An analysis of paramedic verbal reports to physicians in the emergency department trauma room.

机译:对急诊科创伤室医师的口头报告分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To measure the verbal communication between emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps) and physicians in an emergency department trauma room (EDTR) before and after an educational intervention. METHODS: Using a before-after design, we audio-recorded paramedic verbal trauma reports in a large EDTR over a 12-week period. Trained research assistants subsequently queried physicians about information from the paramedic report in a separate interview. Physician recall was quantified. Midway through the study, a web-based, educational intervention designed to enhance paramedic communication skills was administered to the three participating emergency medical services (EMS) systems. Physician recall of more severely injured trauma cases (red triage) was compared with their recall of less severely injured cases (yellow triage). Further comparisons were made between pre- and post-intervention physician recalls, and the extent to which physicians recalled three distinct categories of paramedic verbal information was measured. RESULTS: Overall, physicians accurately recalled 36% of the paramedic verbal report. Information from less severe yellow severe "red" traumas (40% vs. 34% p = 0.02). Pre- and post-intervention recalls were not significantly different (33% vs. 38% p = 0.16). Physicians' recall of information about the crash scene (46%) was significantly greater than their recall of information about the patient's health status (34%) or information about prehospital patient care (30%) (p = 0.0012). CONCLUSION: Physicians appear to recall paramedic verbal reports about trauma patients poorly. Recall is probably multifactorial and will require further work to design appropriate interventions.
机译:目的:在教育干预前后,评估急诊医疗技术人员(EMT-Ps)与急诊科创伤室(EDTR)中的医生之间的口头交流。方法:采用前后设计,我们在大型EDTR中记录了医务人员的口头创伤报告,历时12周。受过训练的研究助手随后在单独的采访中向医生询问了护理人员报告中的信息。内科医生的回忆是量化的。在研究中途,对三个参与的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统进行了基于网络的教育干预,旨在提高医护人员的沟通技巧。将医师对较重受伤的外伤病例(红色分类)的召回与对较轻受伤的外伤病例(黄色分类)的召回进行比较。在干预之前和之后的医生召回之间进行了进一步的比较,并测量了医生召回护理人员的口头信息的三个不同类别的程度。结果:总体而言,医生准确地回忆了护理人员口头报告的36%。来自不太严重的黄色严重“红色”创伤的信息(40%对34%,p = 0.02)。干预前后的召回率没有显着差异(33%对38%,p = 0.16)。医生对撞车现场信息的回忆(46%)显着大于他们对患者健康状况信息(34%)或院前患者护理信息(30%)的回忆(p = 0.0012)。结论:医师似乎记得关于创伤患者的护理人员口头报告很差。召回可能是多因素的,需要进一步的工作来设计适当的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号