...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >Procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters in children: comparison of midazolam/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine.
【24h】

Procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters in children: comparison of midazolam/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine.

机译:儿童中心静脉导管插入术的镇静作用:咪达唑仑/芬太尼与咪达唑仑/氯胺酮的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: There is a lack of studies evaluating procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters (CVC) in pediatric patients in emergency departments or pediatric intensive care units (PICU). This study was designed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the total sedation time for CVC insertion in nonintubated children receiving two sedation regimens. Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either midazolam/fentanyl (M/F) or midazolam/ketamine (M/K) i.v. The Children's Hospital of Wiscosin Sedation Scale was used to score the sedation level. Results: Fifty seven patients were studied (28 M/F and 29 M/K). Group M/F received midazolam (0.24 +/- 0.11 mg.kg(-1)) and fentanyl (1.68 +/- 0.83 mug.kg(-1)) and group M/K received midazolam (0.26 +/- 0.09 mg.kg(-1)) and ketamine (1.40 +/- 0.72 mg.kg(-1)). The groups were similar in age, weight, risk classification time and sedation level. Median total sedation times for M/F and M/K were 97 vs 105 min, respectively (P = 0.67). Minor complications occurred in 3.5% (M/F) vs 20.7% (M/K) (P = 0.03). M/F promoted a greater reduction in respiratory rate (P = 0.005). Conclusions: In this study of nonventilated children in PICU undergoing central line placement, M/F and M/K provided a clinically comparable total sedation time. However, the M/K sedation regimen was associated with a higher rate of minor complications. A longer period of study is required to assess the efficacy and safety of these sedative agents for PICU procedures in nonintubated children.
机译:背景:缺乏研究评估急诊科或小儿重症监护病房(PICU)的小儿患者在中央静脉导管(CVC)插入过程中的镇静作用。本研究旨在评估在接受两种镇静方案的非插管儿童中,CVC插入的总镇静时间是否存在差异。方法:前瞻性将患者随机分配接受咪达唑仑/芬太尼(M / F)或咪达唑仑/氯胺酮(M / K)静脉内注射。威斯康星州儿童医院的镇静量表用于对镇静水平进行评分。结果:研究了57例患者(28 M / F和29 M / K)。 M / F组接受咪达唑仑(0.24 +/- 0.11 mg.kg(-1))和芬太尼(1.68 +/- 0.83 mug.kg(-1)),M / K组接受咪达唑仑(0.26 +/- 0.09 mg .kg(-1))和氯胺酮(1.40 +/- 0.72 mg.kg(-1))。各组的年龄,体重,风险分类时间和镇静水平相似。 M / F和M / K的总镇静时间中位数分别为97分钟和105分钟(P = 0.67)。轻微并发症发生率分别为3.5%(M / F)和20.7%(M / K)(P = 0.03)。 M / F促进了呼吸频率的更大降低(P = 0.005)。结论:在这项研究中,PICU非通风儿童接受中心线放置时,M / F和M / K提供了临床上可比的总镇静时间。然而,M / K镇静方案与较小并发症的发生率较高相关。需要较长时间的研究来评估这些镇静剂在非插管儿童中进行PICU手术的有效性和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号