...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Senses >The Relative Affective Potency of Glycine,L-Serine and Sucrose as Assessed by a Brief-access Taste Test in Inbred Strains of Mice
【24h】

The Relative Affective Potency of Glycine,L-Serine and Sucrose as Assessed by a Brief-access Taste Test in Inbred Strains of Mice

机译:通过近亲品味试验对小鼠近交系中甘氨酸,L-丝氨酸和蔗糖的相对情感效能进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In general,rodents prefer both sucrose and L-serine relative to water and treat both compounds as possessing a similar taste quality (e.g.'sweetness') despite that they are believed to bind with different T1 R heterodimeric receptors in taste bud cells.We assessed the affective potency of these compounds along with glycine,which is thought to bind with both T1 R receptor complexes,using a brief-access taste test in a gustometer.Unconditioned licking responses of two 'taster' strains (C57BL/6J and SWR/J),which display high preference for low concentrations of sucrose,and two 'non-taster' (129P3/J and DBA/2J) strains,which display blunted preference for low concentrations of sucrose,were measured during 5 s trials of varying concentrations of a single compound when mice (n=10/strain/stimulus) were non-deprived and when access to home-cage water was restricted.In non-deprived mice,sucrose generated monotonically increasing concentration-response curves regardless of strain,whereas glycine was only marginally effective at stimulating licking and L-serine produced relatively flat functions.The profile of responsiveness across strains was more complex than expected.For example,when tested with sucrose in the non-deprived condition,the 129P3/J non-taster strain surpassed the responsiveness of taster mice at mid-range to high concentrations.Under water-restricted conditions,these mice also were significantly more responsive to high concentrations of both sucrose and glycine compared with the other strains when stimulus licking was standardized relative to water.Thus,the affective potency of the stimuli tested here seems to be related to the ability of the compounds to bind with the T1 R2+3 receptor complex.However,the profile of strain responsiveness to these tastants in the brief-access test does not appear to be simply explained by the sweetener 'taster' status of the strain.
机译:通常,啮齿类动物比水更喜欢蔗糖和L-丝氨酸,尽管认为它们与味蕾细胞中的不同T1 R异二聚体受体结合,但它们都具有相似的味道质量(例如“甜味”)。这些化合物与甘氨酸的情感效价(通过甘氨酸计的简短访问味觉测试被认为与两种T1 R受体复合物结合)。两种``品味''菌株(C57BL / 6J和SWR / J)的无条件舔responses响应),在低浓度蔗糖的5 s试验中对两种'非-taster'(129P3 / J和DBA / 2J)菌株表现出对低浓度蔗糖的钝化偏爱,它们对低浓度的蔗糖表现出了较高的偏爱。当不剥夺小鼠(n = 10 /株/刺激)并且限制使用自来水时,该化合物是单一化合物。在不剥夺小鼠中,无论应变如何,蔗糖均产生单调增加的浓度-响应曲线,而甘氨酸仅在刺激舔上勉强有效,L-丝氨酸产生相对平坦的功能。所有菌株之间的响应曲线比预期的要复杂。例如,在非剥夺条件下用蔗糖进行测试时,129P3 / J非品尝菌株在中等水位条件下,与其他品系相比,在相对于水刺激舔法标准化的情况下,这些小鼠对高浓度蔗糖和甘氨酸的反应也明显强于其他品系。 ,此处测试的刺激物的情感效价似乎与化合物与T1 R2 + 3受体复合物结合的能力有关。但是,在短暂访问测试中,菌株对这些促味剂反应性的概况似乎并不明显。可以通过菌株的甜味剂“品尝”状态简单解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号