首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Additivity of amino acid digestibility in corn and soybean meal for broiler chickens and White Pekin ducks.
【24h】

Additivity of amino acid digestibility in corn and soybean meal for broiler chickens and White Pekin ducks.

机译:肉鸡和白北京鸭在玉米和豆粕中氨基酸消化率的可加性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A total of 256 broiler chickens and 208 White Pekin ducks were used in a 5-d trial to test additivity of the apparent (AID) and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AA) in corn and soybean meal (SBM). A nitrogen-free diet was used for standardization of apparent digestibility. Two diets contained corn or SBM as the sole source of CP and AA. Another diet was prepared by mixing corn and SBM. Chromic oxide was included as an indigestible marker. Birds received a standard starter diet from d 1 to 21 and thereafter the 4 experimental diets for 5 d in a randomized complete block design. On d 26, digesta from the distal section of the ileum was collected. To test additivity of digestibility values, the difference between measured values in mixed diet and predicted values calculated with measured values in individual ingredients was examined. The estimated basal endogenous losses of N and AA were higher in ducks compared with broilers (P<0.05). Regardless of species, the calculated proportion of basal endogenous losses of CP and AA in calculating SID was higher (P<0.01) in corn than that in SBM. The measured AID of His, Leu, Lys, Met, Phe, Glu, Pro, and Tyr in mixed diets for broilers were higher than predicted values (P<0.05), whereas measured and predicted SID did not differ except for Cys. For ducks, the differences between the measured and predicted AID were significant (P<0.05) for CP and all AA except for 8 AA (Arg, Ile, Thr, Val, Asp, Gly, Pro, and Tyr). Similar to the result from broiler study, there was no difference between the predicted and measured SID of CP and all AA except for Cys. The results showed that AID of some AA for corn and SBM were not additive in the mixed diet, but SID values were additive irrespective of the ingredients and species used. Moreover, extent of difference between measured and predicted values in ducks were higher than that in broilers.
机译:在5天试验中,总共使用了256只肉鸡和208只白色北京鸭来测试玉米和豆粕(SBM)中氨基酸(AA)的表观(AID)和标准化回肠消化率(SID)的可加性。无氮饮食用于表观消化率的标准化。两种饮食中含有玉米或SBM作为CP和AA的唯一来源。通过混合玉米和SBM来准备另一种饮食。氧化铬作为难消化的标志物被包括在内。鸟类从第1天到第21天接受标准的起初日粮,然后在随机完整块设计中接受5天的4种实验日粮。在第26天,收集来自回肠远端部分的消化物。为了测试消化率值的可加性,检查了混合饮食中的测量值与根据各个成分的测量值计算出的预测值之间的差异。与肉仔鸡相比,鸭子的N和AA的基本内源性损失更高(P <0.05)。无论哪种物种,玉米中CP和AA的基础内源性损失在计算SID中所占的比例均高于SBM(P <0.01)。在肉鸡混合日粮中,His,Leu,Lys,Met,Phe,Glu,Pro和Tyr的测定AID高于预测值(P <0.05),而测得的和预测的SID除Cys外没有其他差异。对于鸭子,CP和除8个AA(Arg,Ile,Thr,Val,Asp,Gly,Pro和Tyr)以外的所有AA的实测AID与预测AID之间的差异均显着(P <0.05)。与肉鸡研究结果相似,CP和所有AA(除Cys外)的预测SID和实测SID之间没有差异。结果表明,玉米和SBM中某些AA的AID在混合日粮中没有累加性,但SID值却是累加性,与所使用的成分和种类无关。此外,鸭的实测值与预测值之间的差异程度高于肉鸡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号