...
首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge
【24h】

Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge

机译:益生菌和施用方法对肉鸡对艾美尔球虫攻击的性能和反应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Coccidiosis is an inherent risk in the commercial broiler industry and inflicts devastating economic losses to poultry operations. Probiotics may provide a potential alternative to the prophylactic use of anticoccidials in commercial production. This study evaluated the effects of probiotic applications (feed and water) on bird performance and resistance to a mixed Eimeria infection in commercial broilers. on day of hatch, 1,008 commercial male broilers (Cobb 500) were assigned to 1 of 6 treatments (8 replicate floor pens; 21 birds/pen), including noninfected negative control (NEG), Eimeria-infected positive control (POS), anti-coccidial control (0.01% salinomycin, SAL), intermittent high-dose water-applied probiotic (WPI), continuous low-dose water-applied probiotic (WPC), and feed-supplemented probiotic (FSP). on d 15, all birds except those in NEG were challenged with a mixed inoculum of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella. Measurements were taken on d 7, 15, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Fecal samples were collected from d 20 to 24 for oocyst counts, and lesion scores were evaluated on d 21. Data were analyzed using the Fit Model platform in JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Differences in experimental treatments were tested using Tukey's honestly significant difference following ANO-VA with significance reported at P = 0.05. overall, NEG birds outperformed all other groups. For performance, the probiotic groups were comparable with the SAL-treated birds, except during the 6 d immediately following the Eimeria species challenge, where the SAL birds exhibited better performance. The WPC birds had lower duodenal and jejunal lesion scores, indicating a healthier intestine and enhanced resistance to Eimeria species compared with POS. Birds in the WPI treatment shed fewer oocysts in the feces, although this was not a trend for all of the probiotic treatment groups. The results of this study suggest probiotic supplementation without anticoccidials can enhance performance and help alleviate the negative effects of a mixed Eimeria infection.
机译:球虫病是商业肉鸡行业的固有风险,对家禽经营造成巨大的经济损失。益生菌可能为商业生产中预防性使用球虫药提供了潜在的替代方法。这项研究评估了益生菌施用(饲料和水)对商用肉鸡生产性能和对混合艾美尔氏菌感染的抵抗力的影响。孵化当天,将1,008头商业雄性肉鸡(Cobb 500)分配给6种处理方法之一(8只重复用地笔; 21只鸡/只),包括未感染的阴性对照(NEG),艾美球虫感染的阳性对照(POS),抗球虫控制(0.01%沙利霉素,SAL),间歇性大剂量水应用益生菌(WPI),连续低剂量水应用益生菌(WPC)和饲料补充益生菌(FSP)。在第15天,除NEG中的那些以外的所有鸟都受到了艾美球虫,最大艾美球虫和艾美球虫混合接种物的攻击。在第7、15、21、28、35和42天进行测量。从20到24天收集粪便样品中的卵囊计数,并在第21天评估病变评分。使用JMP中的Fit Model平台分析数据Pro 10.0(SAS Institute Inc.)。在ANO-VA之后,使用Tukey的真实显着差异测试了实验治疗的差异,其显着性报道为P = 0.05。总体而言,NEG禽类的表现优于所有其他类别。就性能而言,益生菌组与经SAL处理的禽类相当,不同的是,在艾美球虫物种攻击后的6天内,SAL禽类表现出更好的性能。与POS相比,WPC鸟类的十二指肠和空肠病变得分较低,表明肠道更健康,对艾美球虫的抵抗力增强。尽管不是所有益生菌治疗组都有这种趋势,但采用WPI处理的禽类在粪便中排泄的卵囊较少。这项研究的结果表明,不含抗球虫药的益生菌补充剂可以增强性能,并有助于减轻混合艾美球虫感染的负面影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Poultry Science》 |2014年第11期|共7页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号