...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >Does ethnicity, gender or age of physiotherapy students affect performance in the final clinical placements? An exploratory study
【24h】

Does ethnicity, gender or age of physiotherapy students affect performance in the final clinical placements? An exploratory study

机译:理疗生的种族,性别或年龄会影响最终临床实习的表现吗?探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To explore demographic differences in awarded marks of the final clinical placement in a physiotherapy undergraduate programme. Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical placement assessment marks. Setting: A London university offering clinical placements throughout South East England. Participants: 333 physiotherapy students entering physiotherapy training between 2005 to 2009. Main outcome measures: Marks awarded following assessment using a clinical placement assessment form. Results: The mean mark (SD) for age were standard entry 71 (7.4) vs. mature entry 72 (7.99) (ns); for gender male 72 (8.45) vs. female 71 (7.21) (ns); and ethnicity White British 72 (7.71) vs. ethnic minority 70 (7.01) (p= 0.023). No interaction effects were observed between the independent variables and only ethnicity demonstrated a statistically significant effect (mean difference (MD) 2.4% 95%CI 0.5 to 4.3, F= 5.24, p= 0.023).This difference was maintained in most subcategories. Significant differences were observed for the interpersonal section (MD 2.21% 95%CI 0.14 to 4.28, F= 4.409, p= 0.03), the clinical reasoning section (MD 2.39% 95%CI 0.53 to 4.25, F= 6.37, p= 0.012) and the treatment section (MD 2.93 95%CI 1.10 to 4.83, F= 9.198, p= 0.003). Conclusions: Physiotherapy students from minority ethnic backgrounds were awarded a significantly lower mark than their white majority peers in final clinical placements, although the difference was small. Potential reasons are considered, with the strongest recommendation being for further enquiry into the potential relationship between ethnicity and success in undergraduate physiotherapy education.
机译:目的:探讨在理疗本科课程中最终临床安置的授予标记的人口统计学差异。设计:临床放置评估标记的回顾性分析。地点:伦敦大学,在整个英格兰东南部提供临床实习。参与者:2005年至2009年之间,有333位理疗专业的学生接受了理疗培训。主要成果衡量指标:评估后使用临床实习评估表授予分数。结果:年龄的平均分数(SD)为标准条目71(7.4)与成熟条目72(7.99)(ns);对于性别而言,男性为72(8.45),而女性为71(7.21)(ns);白人英国人72(7.71)vs少数民族70(7.01)(p = 0.023)。在独立变量之间没有观察到交互作用,只有种族证明具有统计学意义(平均差异(MD)2.4%95%CI 0.5至4.3,F = 5.24,p = 0.023)。在大多数子类别中这种差异得以保持。人际交往部分(MD 2.21%95%CI 0.14至4.28,F = 4.409,p = 0.03),临床推理部分(MD 2.39%95%CI 0.53至4.25,F = 6.37,p = 0.012)观察到显着差异)和治疗部位(MD 2.93 95%CI 1.10至4.83,F = 9.198,p = 0.003)。结论:在少数族裔背景下的物理治疗学生在最终临床实习中获得的分数明显低于白人多数同龄人,尽管差异很小。考虑了潜在的原因,最强烈的建议是进一步查询种族与大学理疗教育成功之间的潜在关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号