...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical therapy in sport: official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine >A comparison of electromyography of gluteus medius and maximus in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability during two functional exercises
【24h】

A comparison of electromyography of gluteus medius and maximus in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability during two functional exercises

机译:两种功能锻炼期间有和没有慢性踝关节不稳的受试者中臀大肌和最大肌电图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To determine how gluteus medius (Gmed) and maximus (Gmax) activate during closed-chain functional rehabilitative exercises in those with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). Design: Cohort study. Subjects performed ten repetitions of a rotational lunge and single-leg rotational squat while surface electromyography was used to collect mean muscle activity of the Gmed and Gmax. Main outcome measures: Mean electromyography activity of the Gmed and Gmax at maximum excursion was compared between Groups and Exercises using a separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance design for each muscle. Setting: University biomechanics lab. Participants: Nine healthy (8F, 1M) and nine CAI subjects (8F, 1M). Results: For Gmax activation, there was a statistically significant Group by Exercise interaction (F3,48 = 4.84, p = 0.043). A Scheffe's post-hoc test revealed that during the rotational squat, the CAI group had significantly lower Gmax activation (51.1 ?? 31.0%) than the healthy group (78.6 ?? 44.8%). There were no statistically significant findings for the Gmed. In the healthy group, the Gmax produced significantly higher activation during rotational squat (78.6 ?? 44.8%) compared to the rotational lunge (57.6 ?? 31.9%). Conclusion: Because the CAI group had significantly less Gmax activation than the healthy group during the rotational squat at the point of maximum excursion, and because the rotational squat showed significantly higher Gmax activation compared to the rotational lunge, it may be important for clinicians to implement the rotational squat during rehabilitation for those with CAI. Future prospective and intervention research involving hip musculature in those with CAI is recommended. ? 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:目的:确定患有和不患有慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的患者在闭合链功能康复运动中的臀小肌(Gmed)和臀大肌(Gmax)的激活方式。设计:队列研究。受试者进行了十次重复的旋转弓步和单腿旋转下蹲训练,而表面肌电图则用于收集Gmed和Gmax的平均肌肉活动。主要结局指标:使用单独的2次重复测量方法对每条肌肉的变异设计进行比较,比较各组和练习之间Gmed和Gmax在最大偏移时的平均肌电图活动。地点:大学生物力学实验室。参与者:9名健康(8F,1M)和9名CAI受试者(8F,1M)。结果:对于Gmax激活,按锻炼交互作用具有统计学意义的分组(F3,48 = 4.84,p = 0.043)。 Scheffe的事后测试显示,在深蹲期间,CAI组的Gmax激活(51.1%31.0%)明显低于健康组(78.6%44.8%)。对于Gmed,没有统计学意义的发现。在健康组中,与旋转弓步(57.6%31.9%)相比,Gmax在旋转深蹲期间产生的活化明显更高(78.6±44.8%)。结论:由于在最大偏移时,CAI组在旋转深蹲期间的Gmax激活明显少于健康组,并且由于旋转深蹲比旋转弓形显示出显着更高的Gmax激活,因此对于临床医生来说可能很重要CAI患者康复期间的旋转下蹲。建议对CAI患者进行涉及臀部肌肉组织的未来前瞻性研究和干预研究。 ? 2012爱思唯尔有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号