首页> 外文期刊>Pit & Quarry >The best loss control has a downside
【24h】

The best loss control has a downside

机译:最好的损失控制有一个缺点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Every manager concedes that there is a need for protection. The mixed can of cobras and boa constrictors that this concession opens is the question: how much protection and under what conditions? Agreement is strongest when protection and production are mutually successful. The best protection is the most productive in the long term. In the short term the implementation of protection often produces conflict. Sometimes protection takes time to show its benefits. However, once protection shows benefits, aggressive managers sometimes discover a new tool, machine or method to exploit to enhance production. It is the safety person's delight every time protection turns out to be productive and the production can be demonstrated and confirmed. Loss control's downside occurs at the point at which the protective feature is over-exploited for production. Consider two historic examples.
机译:每个经理都承认需要保护。这个让步打开的眼镜蛇和蟒蛇的混合罐是一个问题:需要多少保护,在什么条件下?当保护和生产相互成功时,协议最牢固。从长远来看,最好的保护是最有效的。在短期内,实施保护常常会产生冲突。有时,保护需要花费一些时间才能证明其益处。但是,一旦保护显示出好处,积极进取的管理人员有时会发现一种新的工具,机器或方法,可以用来提高产量。每次保护生产出来并被证明可以确认生产时,是安全人员的喜悦。损失控制的不利方面发生在保护功能被过度开发用于生产的时候。考虑两个历史例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号