首页> 外文期刊>Physical review, E >Comparison of the lattice Boltzmann equation and discrete unified gas-kinetic scheme methods for direct numerical simulation of decaying turbulent flows
【24h】

Comparison of the lattice Boltzmann equation and discrete unified gas-kinetic scheme methods for direct numerical simulation of decaying turbulent flows

机译:晶格Boltzmann方程与离散统一气体动力学方案方法在衰减湍流衰减直接数值模拟中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The main objective of this work is to perform a detailed comparison of the lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE) and the recently developed discrete unified gas-kinetic scheme (DUGKS) methods for direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence and the Kida vortex flow in a periodic box. The flow fields and key statistical quantities computed by both methods are compared with those from the pseudospectral method at both low and moderate Reynolds numbers. The results show that the LBE is more accurate and efficient than the DUGKS, but the latter has a superior numerical stability, particularly for high Reynolds number flows. In addition, we conclude that the DUGKS can adequately resolve the flow when the minimum spatial resolution parameter k(max)eta > 3, where k(max) is the maximum resolved wave number and eta is the flow Kolmogorov length. This resolution requirement can be contrasted with the requirements of k(max)eta > 1 for the pseudospectral method and k(max)eta > 2 for the LBE. It should be emphasized that although more validations should be conducted before the DUGKS can be called a viable tool for DNS of turbulent flows, the present work contributes to the overall assessment of the DUGKS, and it provides a basis for further applications of DUGKS in studying the physics of turbulent flows.
机译:这项工作的主要目的是对晶格玻尔兹曼方程(LBE)与最近开发的用于离散均质各向同性湍流和Kida的直接数值模拟(DNS)的离散统一气体动力学方案(DUGKS)方法进行详细的比较。周期性盒中的涡流。将这两种方法计算出的流场和关键统计量与低雷诺数和中雷诺数下的伪光谱法进行比较。结果表明,LBE比DUGKS更准确和有效,但后者具有出色的数值稳定性,尤其是对于高雷诺数流。此外,我们得出结论,当最小空间分辨率参数k(max)eta> 3时,DUGGS可以充分解析流,其中k(max)是最大解析波数,而eta是流Kolmogorov长度。此分辨率要求可以与伪光谱方法的k(max)eta> 1和LBE的k(max)eta> 2的要求形成对比。应该强调的是,尽管在将DUGKS称为用于湍流DNS的可行工具之前应该进行更多的验证,但当前的工作有助于DUGKS的整体评估,并且为DUGKS在研究中的进一步应用提供了基础湍流的物理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号