首页> 外文期刊>Planning Practice & Research >How to Turn a Planning Conflict into a Planning Success? Conditions for Constructive Conflict Management in the Case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium
【24h】

How to Turn a Planning Conflict into a Planning Success? Conditions for Constructive Conflict Management in the Case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium

机译:如何将计划冲突变成计划成功?比利时安特卫普Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg案中建设性冲突管理的条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spatial projects are often contested. In most cases, contested planning projects evolve into what some conflict scholars have labeled as destructive or intractable conflicts. However, collaborative planning theorists claim that under certain conditions, conflicts can result into constructive outcomes. The Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg case in Antwerp, Flanders, might be considered as a conflict with a constructive outcome. We reflect upon the conditions for constructive conflict management and argue that public authority, citizens and experts have to leave their traditional roles. This implies openness to collaborative approaches from the public authority, governance capacity from citizens and finally a collaborative approach toward design.
机译:空间项目经常引起争议。在大多数情况下,有争议的计划项目会演变成一些冲突学者所说的破坏性或顽固性冲突。但是,协作计划理论家声称,在某些情况下,冲突可能导致建设性结果。法兰德斯安特卫普的Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg案可能被认为是具有建设性结果的冲突。我们反思了建设性冲突管理的条件,并认为公共权威,公民和专家必须放弃其传统角色。这意味着对公共机构的协作方法持开放态度,对公民的治理能力持开放态度,最后是对设计的协作态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号