...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies.
【24h】

Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies.

机译:对社区药房配药错误的发生率,性质和原因进行前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Each year over 600 million prescription items are dispensed in community pharmacies in England and Wales. Despite this, there is little published evidence relating to dispensing errors and near misses occurring in this setting. This study sought to determine their incidence, nature and causes. METHODS: Prospective study over a 4-week period in 35 community pharmacies (9 independent pharmacies and 26 chain pharmacies) in the UK. Pharmacists recorded details of all incidents that occurred during the dispensing process, including information about: the stage at which the error was detected; who found the error; who made the error; type of error; reported cause of error and circumstances associated with the error. RESULTS: 125,395 prescribed items were dispensed during the study period and 330 incidents were recorded relating to 310 prescriptions. 280 (84.8%) incidents were classified as a near miss (rate per 10,000 items dispensed=22.33, 95%CI 19.79-25.10), while the remaining 50 (15.2%) were classified as dispensing errors (rate per 10,000 items dispensed=3.99, 95%CI 2.96-5.26). Selection errors were the most common types of incidents (199, 60.3%), followed by labeling (109, 33.0%) and bagging errors (22, 6.6%). Most of the incidents were caused either by misreading the prescription (90, 24.5%), similar drug names (62, 16.8%), selecting the previous drug or dose from the patient's medication record on the pharmacy computer (42, 11.4%) or similar packaging (28, 7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that a wide range of medication errors occur in community pharmacies. On average, for every 10,000 items dispensed, there are around 22 near misses and four dispensing errors. Given the current plans for reporting adverse events in the NHS, greater insight into the likely incidence and nature of dispensing errors will be helpful in designing effective risk management strategies in primary care.
机译:背景:每年在英格兰和威尔士的社区药房中分发超过6亿种处方药。尽管如此,在这种情况下,很少有公开的证据与点胶错误和几乎未命中有关。这项研究试图确定其发病率,性质和原因。方法:在英国的35家社区药店(9家独立药店和26家连锁药店)进行了为期4周的前瞻性研究。药剂师记录了在分配过程中发生的所有事件的详细信息,包括有关以下信息:检测到错误的阶段;谁发现了错误;谁犯了错误;错误类型;报告的错误原因和与错误相关的情况。结果:在研究期间分配了125,395个处方项目,并记录了与310个处方相关的330起事件。 280次(84.8%)事件被归为差错(每10,000件分配的比率= 22.33,95%CI 19.79-25.10),而其余50件(15.2%)被归类为分配错误(每10,000件分配的比率= 3.99) ,95%CI 2.96-5.26)。选择错误是最常见的事件类型(199,60.3%),其次是标签(109,33.0%)和装箱错误(22,6.6%)。大多数事件是由以下原因造成的:误读处方(90,24.5%),相似的药物名称(62,16.8%),从药房计算机上的患者用药记录中选择先前的药物或剂量(42,11.4%)或类似包装(28,7.6%)。结论:这项研究表明社区药房发生了广泛的用药错误。平均而言,每分配10,000个项目,大约有22个未命中项目和四个分配错误。鉴于当前报告NHS中不良事件的计划,对配药错误的可能发生率和性质进行更深入的了解将有助于在基层医疗中设计有效的风险管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号