...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Reply letter: Are FDA prescription drug safety plans working? A case study of isotretinoin
【24h】

Reply letter: Are FDA prescription drug safety plans working? A case study of isotretinoin

机译:回信:FDA处方药安全计划是否有效?异维A酸的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We appreciate Van Bennekom and Mitchell's perspective in designing and implementing surveys to evaluate drug safety plans. The Accutane Survey is an impressive example of the potential knowledge that may be gained by these surveys. However, there are important methodological challenges in using surveys to assess FDA initiatives such as the iPledge program and more recent Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies for prescription drugs.First, as the authors acknowledge in their 1995 report, surveys that measure patient behavior for a drug safety program can be subject to selection bias from differences in program adherence between those who participate and those who do not. Second, information bias due to participants failing to report non-adherence to physician instructions or patient labeling is another important validity threat.Third, surveys such as the Accutane Survey (n > 492 000) are often very costly and therefore infeasible. Finally, unless surveys are longitudinal in nature, they cannot provide serial evaluations of the impact of a policy change.
机译:我们赞赏Van Bennekom和Mitchell在设计和实施调查以评估药物安全计划时的观点。 Accutane调查是这些调查可能获得的潜在知识的令人印象深刻的示例。但是,在使用调查评估FDA举措(例如iPledge计划和最新的处方药风险评估和缓解策略)时,存在重大的方法学挑战。参加者与不参加者之间在遵守计划方面的差异可能会导致选择安全偏见。其次,由于参与者未能报告未遵循医师指导或患者标签而导致的信息偏倚是另一个重要的有效性威胁。第三,诸如Accutane调查(n> 492 000)之类的调查通常非常昂贵,因此不可行。最后,除非调查是纵向调查,否则它们无法对政策变更的影响进行连续评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号