首页> 外文期刊>Women's History Review >Feminist Inheritances and Foremothers: the beginnings of feminism in modern India
【24h】

Feminist Inheritances and Foremothers: the beginnings of feminism in modern India

机译:女权主义的传承与后代:现代印度女权主义的开始

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article illumines the nature and content of modern Indian feminism, tracing its beginnings in the great nineteentha??century social and religious reform movements in Maharashtra, Western India. Early feminist theory is tracked in the theories of womena??s subordination proposed by Christian and Hindu feminists. The linguistic sophistication in feminist genealogy is revealed through womena??s critiques of Indian society and gender relations, especially the formation of two key feminist concepts: condition of the a??stria??jatia?? (womankind) and a??bhaginivarga?? (sisterhood), aided by the a??womena??s pressa?? in the Marathi language. Their attacks on the shastras (religious texts) is considered as an important marker in their progression towards feminism. The article closes with an examination of womena??s selfa??assertion movements through the utilisation of law courts. In doing so, it counters the current historiography by arguing that if Indian patriarchy felt under siege during the Age of Consent (1891) controversy, it can only be explained by the threat posed by womena??s agency.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2010.502398
机译:本文阐明了现代印度女权主义的性质和内容,其起源可以追溯到印度西部马哈拉施特拉邦的十九世纪伟大的社会和宗教改革运动。基督教和印度教女权主义者提出的妇女从属理论是对早期女权主义理论的追踪。女性主义家谱中的语言复杂性是通过妇女对印度社会和性别关系的批评而揭示出来的,特别是形成了两个关键的女性主义概念:“条纹”的条件。 (womankind)和一个?bhaginivarga? (姐妹),在a?womena?pressa?用马拉地语。他们对宗教的抨击被认为是其向女权主义发展的重要标志。本文的结尾部分是通过利用法院对妇女的自私主张运动的考察。通过这样做,它反驳了当前的史学,认为如果印度父权制在同意时代(1891年)的争议中受到围困,那只能由女性机构所构成的威胁来解释。查看全文下载全文相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2010.502398

著录项

  • 来源
    《Women's History Review》 |2010年第4期|523-546|共24页
  • 作者

    Padma Anagol;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:05:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号