首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >The impact of cost recovery and sharing system on water policy implementation and human right to water: a case of Ileje, Tanzania
【24h】

The impact of cost recovery and sharing system on water policy implementation and human right to water: a case of Ileje, Tanzania

机译:成本回收和分摊制度对水政策执行和水权的影响:以坦桑尼亚伊莱耶为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Tanzania, the National Water Policy (NAWAPO) of 2002 clearly stipulates that access to water supply and sanitation is a right for every Tanzanian and that cost recovery is the foundation of sustainable service delivery. To meet these demands, water authorities have introduced cost recovery and a water sharing system. The overall objective of this study was to assess the impact of cost recovery and the sharing system on water policy implementation and human rights to water in four villages in the Ileje district. The specific objectives were: (1) to assess the impact of cost recovery and the sharing system on the availability of water to the poor, (2) to assess user willingness to pay for the services provided, (3) to assess community understanding on the issue of water as a human right, (4) to analyse the implications of the results in relation to policies on human rights to water and the effectiveness of the implementation of the national water policy at the grassroots, and (5) to establish the guidelines for water pricing in rural areas. Questionnaires at water demand, water supply, ability and willingness to pay and revenue collection were the basis for data collection. While 36.7 of the population in the district had water supply coverage, more than 73,077 people of the total population of 115,996 still lacked access to clean and safe water and sanitation services in the Ileje district. The countrys rural water supply coverage is 49. Seventy-nine percent of the interviewees in all four villages said that water availability in litres per household per day had decreased mainly due to high water pricing which did not consider the income of villagers. On the other hand, more than 85 of the villagers were not satisfied with the amount they were paying because the services were still poor. On the issue of human rights to water, more than 92 of the villagers know about their right to water and want it exercised by the government. In all four villages, more than 78 of the interviewees are willing to pay for water provided that the tariffs are affordable. Water policy implementation continues slowly: regardless of the fact that more than five years have passed since policy inception, 60 of the villagers in Itumba still have no water services at all. The study shows that government fulfilment of human rights to water has a long way to go, especially in rural areas where people cannot afford to pay for water and some of the villages still depend on water from wells and seasonal rivers.
机译:在坦桑尼亚,2002年的国家水政策(NAWAPO)明确规定,获得供水和卫生设施是每个坦桑尼亚人的权利,而成本回收是可持续提供服务的基础。为了满足这些需求,水务部门引入了成本回收和水分配系统。这项研究的总体目标是评估成本回收和分摊制度对Ileje地区四个村庄的水政策实施和水权的影响。具体目标是:(1)评估成本回收和共享系统对穷人的水供应的影响;(2)评估用户为所提供的服务付费的意愿;(3)评估社区对以下方面的理解:水是一项人权问题,(4)分析结果对水权政策的影响以及在基层实施国家水政策的有效性,以及(5)农村水价准则。有关水需求,水供应,支付能力和收款意愿的问卷调查是数据收集的基础。虽然该地区36.7的人口拥有供水设施,但在115,996的总人口中,超过73,077的人仍然无法在Ileje地区获得清洁,安全的水和卫生服务。该国的农村供水覆盖率为49。在所有四个村庄中,有79%的受访者表示,每户每天的用水量以升为单位有所下降,这主要是由于高水价而未考虑到村民的收入。另一方面,由于服务水平仍然很差,超过85个村民对他们所支付的金额不满意。在水权问题上,超过92个村民了解他们的水权,并希望政府行使水权。在所有四个村庄中,只要价格可以负担,超过78名受访者愿意支付水费。供水政策的实施进展缓慢:无论政策制定以来已经过去了五年多的时间,伊图巴的60个村民仍然根本没有供水服务。研究表明,政府实现水的人权还有很长的路要走,特别是在农村地区,人们无力支付水费,而且一些村庄仍然依靠水井和季节性河流的水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号