首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance: An Empirically Illustrated Research Approach
【24h】

Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance: An Empirically Illustrated Research Approach

机译:评估洪水风险治理中的稳定性和动态性:一种以经验说明的研究方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

European urban agglomerations face increasing flood risks due to urbanization and the effects of climate change. These risks are addressed at European, national and regional policy levels. A diversification and alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies (FRMSs) can make vulnerable urban agglomerations more resilient to flooding, but this may require new Flood Risk Governance Arrangements (FRGAs) or changes in existing ones. While much technical knowledge on Flood Risk Management is available, scientific insights into the actual and/or necessary FRGAs so far are rather limited and fragmented. This article addresses this knowledge gap by presenting a research approach for assessing FRGAs. This approach allows for the integration of insights from policy scientists and legal scholars into one coherent framework that can be used to identify Flood Risk Management Strategies and analyse Flood Risk Governance Arrangements. In addition, approaches for explaining and evaluating (shifts in) FRGAs are introduced. The research approach is illustrated by referring to the rise of the Dutch risk-based approach called 'multi-layered safety' and more specifically its application in the city of Dordrecht. The article is concluded with an overview of potential next steps, including comparative analyses of FRGAs in different regions. Insights in these FRGAS are crucial to enable the identification of action perspectives for flood risk governance for actors at the level of the EU, its member states, regional authorities, and public-private partnerships.
机译:由于城市化和气候变化的影响,欧洲城市群面临着日益增加的洪水风险。这些风险在欧洲,国家和地区政策层面得到解决。洪灾风险管理策略(FRMS)的多样化和统一可以使脆弱的城市群对洪灾的抵御能力更强,但这可能需要新的洪灾风险治理安排(FRGA)或对现有的进行变更。尽管可获得许多有关洪水风险管理的技术知识,但到目前为止,对实际和/或必要的FRGA的科学见解十分有限且支离破碎。本文通过提出一种评估FRGA的研究方法来解决这一知识鸿沟。这种方法可以将政策科学家和法律学者的见解整合到一个一致的框架中,该框架可用于确定洪水风险管理策略并分析洪水风险治理安排。另外,介绍了用于解释和评估(转换)FRGA的方法。通过参考称为“多层安全性”的荷兰基于风险的方法的兴起,尤其是在多德雷赫特市的应用,说明了该研究方法。最后,本文概述了可能的后续步骤,包括对不同地区的FRGA进行比较分析。这些FRGAS的见解对于为欧盟,其成员国,区域当局和公私伙伴关系一级的参与者确定洪水风险治理的行动观点至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water Resources Management》 |2014年第12期|4127-4142|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;

    Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;

    Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;

    Department Geography, Planning and Environment, Group Political Sciences of the Environment, Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Management Research (IMR), PO Box 9108, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands;

    Grontmij Nederland BV, Division Transportation & Mobility, Department of Hydraulic Construction, Team Coastal and Rivers, De Holle Bilt 22, 3732 HM De Bilt, The Netherlands;

    Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht School of Law, Achter Sint Pieter 200, 3512 HT Utrecht, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Flood risk management strategies; Europe; Dordrecht; Resilience; Legitimacy; Efficiency; Effectiveness; Flood risk governance arrangements;

    机译:洪水风险管理策略;欧洲;多德雷赫特弹性;合法性;效率;效力;洪水风险治理安排;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号