首页> 外文期刊>The Urban Review >Market Movements and the Dispossessed: Race, Identity, and Subaltern Agency among Black Women Voucher Advocates
【24h】

Market Movements and the Dispossessed: Race, Identity, and Subaltern Agency among Black Women Voucher Advocates

机译:市场动向和被抛弃者:黑人女性代言人中的种族,身份和次级代理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Critical educational researchers in the United States and elsewhere are missing something essential in their inattention to considerable support among Black urban women for market-based educational reforms, including vouchers. While the educational left has engaged in important empirical and theoretical work demonstrating the particularly negative impact of educational marketization on the disenfranchised, not enough attention has been paid to the crucial role the educationally dispossessed have actually played in building these otherwise conservative reforms. Engaging with Michael Apple's arguments concerning processes of identity formation within conservative movement-making, we can begin to conceptualize the importance of subaltern groups in market-based educational reforms. Yet ethnographic work conducted with Black voucher mothers, school officials, and community leaders in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, shows that this subaltern process of conservative formation does not always occur in the manner theorized by Apple and his colleague Anita Oliver, in which ideologically relatively unformed parents and families are "pushed" to the Right by an intransigent state. Although the conceptual tools they provide are the foundation of our ability to imagine a more compelling theori-zation of dynamics and social actors in Milwaukee, significant conceptual—not to mention empirical—work remains to be done. In this essay I renovate Apple and Oliver's arguments concerning conservative modernization in order to make them more resonant with the processes of race, gender, subaltern identity formation and agency evident in my ethnographic field research with low-income African-American women choosing vouchers for their families in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Aided by critical, feminist, and post-structural theorists both within and outside educational disciplines I assess the utility and limitations of Apple and Oliver's framework in explaining the mobilization around 'parental choice' and vouchers in Milwaukee. Based on my conceptual and empirical findings, I retheorize pro-voucher African-American politicians, community leaders, and poor and working class women (and their families) as representative of a subaltern third force' in conservative formation. Their tactical investments in fleeting conservative alliances and subject positions, I argue, are likely to play an increasingly significant role in educational and social reform both in the United States and elsewhere.
机译:美国和其他地方的重要教育研究人员缺少必要的东西,因为他们没有注意黑人城市妇女对基于市场的教育改革(包括代金券)的大量支持。尽管教育左派从事重要的经验和理论工作,证明了教育市场化对被剥夺权利者的特别负面影响,但人们对教育者在构建这些原本保守的改革中实际上发挥的关键作用并未给予足够的重视。结合迈克尔·苹果(Michael Apple)关于保守运动中的身份形成过程的论点,我们可以开始概念化次要小组在基于市场的教育改革中的重要性。然而,与威斯康星州密尔沃基市的黑人代金券母亲,学校官员和社区领袖进行的人种学研究表明,这种保守形成的次要过程并不总是以苹果及其同事安妮塔·奥利弗(Anita Oliver)的理论为基础的,在思想上相对较不成熟的父母而一个顽固的国家将家庭“推”到右翼。尽管它们提供的概念工具是我们能够想象密尔沃基动力学和社会行为者更引人入胜的理论化能力的基础,但仍有大量重要的概念工作(更不用说经验工作了)。在本文中,我更新了Apple和Oliver关于保守主义现代化的论点,以使它们与种族,性别,次要身份形成和代理过程更加共鸣,这在我的人种学领域研究中很明显,低收入的非洲裔美国妇女选择了代金券威斯康星州密尔沃基的家庭。在教育学科内外的批判,女权主义和后结构理论家的帮助下,我评估了Apple和Oliver框架在解释密尔沃基围绕“父母选择”和代金券动员方面的效用和局限性。根据我的概念和实证研究结果,我重新对有优惠券的非裔美国政治家,社区领袖以及贫穷和工人阶级的妇女(及其家庭)进行了理论上的描述,以作为保守派第三力量的代表。我认为,他们在短暂的保守联盟和学科位置上的战术投资可能会在美国和其他地区的教育和社会改革中发挥越来越重要的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号