首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Civic Life in the Divided Metropolis: Social Capital, Collective Action, and Residential Income Segregation
【24h】

Civic Life in the Divided Metropolis: Social Capital, Collective Action, and Residential Income Segregation

机译:分裂大都市中的公民生活:社会资本,集体行动和居民收入隔离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social capital is presumed to help individuals who lack financial or human capital achieve collective action through their social ties and networks of relationships. But does it help individuals overcome their socioeconomic disadvantages relative to their wealthier neighbors, or does the accumulation of social capital merely reproduce socioeconomic disparities, particularly in economically segregated places? Leveraging data from the Current Population Survey, I test whether residential income segregation is associated with larger income differences in social capital investments and collective action. I find that in more economically segregated places, wealthier residents are more likely to be members of neighborhood organizations and report working with other community members to address local issues. These results are robust to the inclusion of other potential confounders, including income inequality, racial context, and racial residential segregation. This research has implications for policy makers and stakeholders interested in building a more inclusive civic arena.
机译:假定社会资本可以帮助缺乏财务或人力资本的个人通过其社会纽带和关系网络实现集体行动。但是,这是否有助于个人克服相对于较富裕邻居的社会经济劣势,还是社会资本的积累只是在再现社会经济差异,特别是在经济隔离的地方?利用当前人口调查的数据,我测试了居民收入隔离是否与社会资本投资和集体行动中更大的收入差异相关。我发现在经济上更加隔离的地方,较富裕的居民更有可能成为社区组织的成员,并报告与其他社区成员合作解决当地问题。这些结果对于包含其他潜在混杂因素(包括收入不平等,种族背景和种族居住隔离)是有力的。这项研究对有兴趣建立更具包容性的公民竞技场的政策制定者和利益相关者有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号