首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Part B: Methodological >A practical method to test the validity of the standard Gumbel distribution in logit-based multinomial choice models of travel behavior
【24h】

A practical method to test the validity of the standard Gumbel distribution in logit-based multinomial choice models of travel behavior

机译:在基于logit的出行行为多项选择模型中测试标准Gumbel分布有效性的实用方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most multinomial choice models (e.g., the multinomial logit model) adopted in practice assume an extreme-value Gumbel distribution for the random components (error terms) of utility functions. This distributional assumption offers a closed-form likelihood expression when the utility maximization principle is applied to model choice behaviors. As a result, model coefficients can be easily estimated using the standard maximum likelihood estimation method. However, maximum likelihood estimators are consistent and efficient only if distributional assumptions on the random error terms are valid. It is therefore critical to test the validity of underlying distributional assumptions on the error terms that form the basis of parameter estimation and policy evaluation. In this paper, a practical yet statistically rigorous method is proposed to test the validity of the distributional assumption on the random components of utility functions in both the multinomial logit (MNL) model and multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model. Based on a semi-nonparametric approach, a closed-form likelihood function that nests the MNL or MDCEV model being tested is derived. The proposed method allows traditional likelihood ratio tests to be used to test violations of the standard Gumbel distribution assumption. Simulation experiments are conducted to demonstrate that the proposed test yields acceptable Type-I and Type-II error probabilities at commonly available sample sizes. The test is then applied to three real-world discrete and discrete-continuous choice models. For all three models, the proposed test rejects the validity of the standard Gumbel distribution in most utility functions, calling for the development of robust choice models that overcome adverse effects of violations of distributional assumptions on the error terms in random utility functions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在实践中采用的大多数多项式选择模型(例如,多项式对数模型)均假定效用函数的随机分量(误差项)具有极值的Gumbel分布。当效用最大化原则应用于模型选择行为时,这种分布假设提供了一种封闭形式的似然表达式。结果,可以使用标准最大似然估计方法容易地估计模型系数。但是,仅当随机误差项的分布假设有效时,最大似然估计量才是一致且有效的。因此,至关重要的是,在构成参数估计和政策评估基础的误差项上测试基础分布假设的有效性。本文提出了一种实用而统计严谨的方法,以检验多项式对数(MNL)模型和多重离散连续极值(MDCEV)模型中效用函数随机分量的分布假设的有效性。基于半非参数方法,得出了一个嵌套形式的似然函数,该函数嵌套了正在测试的MNL或MDCEV模型。所提出的方法允许使用传统的似然比测试来测试违反标准Gumbel分布假设的情况。进行模拟实验以证明所提出的测试在通常可用的样本量下产生可接受的I型和II型错误概率。然后将该测试应用于三个实际的离散和离散连续选择模型。对于所有这三个模型,建议的测试均拒绝大多数效用函数中标准Gumbel分布的有效性,要求开发健壮的选择模型,以克服违反分布假设对随机效用函数中误差项的不利影响。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号