首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASAE >EVALUATION OF TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR SYSTEMS FOR ANIMAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
【24h】

EVALUATION OF TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR SYSTEMS FOR ANIMAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

机译:动物污水处理的两阶段厌氧分批反应器系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Anaerobic treatment of screened swine and dairy manure was studied in the laboratory with two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) systems. The effects of anaerobic treatment on odor control in subsequent manure storage units were evaluated. One thermophilic (55°C) mesophilic (35°C) system (II) was evaluated against one mesophilic (35°C) mesophilic (35°C) system (I) at a system hydraulic retention time (HRT) of six days and four volatile solid (VS) loading rates (1, 2, 3, 4 g/L/day). Generally, anaerobic digestion under all the test conditions resulted in higher solids reduction in swine manure than in dairy manure. The thermophilic-mesophilic system had a better performance in treating dairy and swine manure with 6 to 15% more VS removal than the mesophilic-mesophilic system. The headspace gas analysis results using manure storage jars showed that both systems were effective in reducing the generation of odorous sulfur gases during storage. The untreated dairy and swine manure exhibited strong offensive odors with high hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) and mercaptan concentrations detected in the headspaces of storage jars. The anaerobically treated manure, however, showed minimal residual odors while in many cases, H 2 S and mercaptans were not detectable. With the consideration of its better capability for destructing fecal bacteria in animal manure, the thermophilic-mesophilic ASBR system is more advantageous than the mesophilic-mesophilic ASBR system for treating animal manure. However, the higher energy requirement for heating the reactors in the former system needs to be considered when selecting thermophilic vs. mesophilic anaerobic digestion systems.
机译:在实验室中,采用两级厌氧排序批处理反应器(ASBR)系统研究了筛选的猪粪和奶牛粪的厌氧处理。评估了厌氧处理对后续粪便存储单元中气味控制的影响。在系统水力停留时间(HRT)为六天的情况下,针对一个中温(35°C)中温(35°C)系统(I)对一个嗜热(55°C)中温(35°C)系统(II)进行了评估,四种挥发性固体(VS)加载速率(1、2、3、4 g / L /天)。通常,在所有测试条件下进行厌氧消化,猪粪中的固体减少量要高于奶牛粪中的减少量。嗜温中温系统在乳制品和猪粪中的处理性能要比中温中温系统高6至15%。使用粪便储存罐进行的顶空气体分析结果表明,两种系统均能有效减少储存期间产生的有味硫磺气体。未经处理的奶牛粪便表现出强烈的恶臭味,在储存罐的顶部空间检测到高硫化氢(H 2 S)和硫醇浓度。然而,经厌氧处理的肥料显示出的残留异味极少,而在许多情况下,则无法检测到H 2 S和硫醇。考虑到其具有更好的破坏动物粪便中粪便细菌的能力,与嗜温-嗜温ASBR系统相比,嗜温-嗜温ASBR系统在处理动物粪便方面更具优势。但是,在选择嗜热与中温厌氧消化系统时,需要考虑对前一个系统中的反应器进行加热所需要的更高能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号