首页> 外文期刊>Thin-Walled Structures >Interacted buckling failure of thin-nailed irregular-shaped aluminum alloy column under axial compression
【24h】

Interacted buckling failure of thin-nailed irregular-shaped aluminum alloy column under axial compression

机译:薄壁钉形异型铝合金轴压相互作用屈曲破坏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Interacted buckling behaviors and ultimate strength of thin-walled aluminum alloy columns with irregular-shaped cross section were studied using a verified Finite Element Model (FEM). Six interacted buckling failure modes were studied, which were: (1) the interaction of Local bucking and sectional Yielding (LY); (2) the interaction of Local and Global buckling (LG); (3) the interaction of Distortional buckling and sectional Yielding (DY); (4) the interaction of Distortional and Global buckling (DG); (5) the interaction of Local bucking, Distortional bucking and sectional Yielding (LDY or DLY); and (6) the interaction of Local, Distortional and Global buckling (LDG). The load-axial displacement curve, the deflection-axial displacement curve, the development of the axial stress at different positions in the section at mid-span, the out-of-plane displacement at failure along the column length and the axial stress distribution at failure across the section at mid-span were presented. The local buckling and distortional buckling were detected by the turning points on the load-axial displacement curves. The out-of-plane displacement along the column length at failure was used to illustrate the failure mode of the column. Ultimate strengths and failure modes of 174 columns failed by interacted buckling failure modes were investigated by both FEM and current design approaches. For the ultimate strength of the columns under DY failure mode, the results predicted by North American specification for the design of cold-formed steel structural members of American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) were higher than FEM simulation results. The ultimate strength predicted by American Aluminum Design Manual (AA), Direct Strength Method (DSM), European Code (EN1999) and Chinese Design Specification for Aluminum Alloy Structures (GB50429) were lower than FEM simulation results, no matter what kind of failure modes the column encountered. Mean values of P-AA/P-FEA, P-EC9/P-FEA and P-GB/P-FEA were 0.81, 0.79 and 0.74. DSM could precisely predict the Global buckling (G), LG and DY failure modes. However, for the columns failed by LY, DG, LDY and LDG, they were LG, G, DY and LG when predicted by DSM, respectively. The applicability of DSM to thin-walled aluminum alloy columns with irregular-shaped cross section should be investigated further. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:使用验证的有限元模型(FEM)研究了截面不规则形的铝合金薄壁柱的相互作用屈曲行为和极限强度。研究了六个相互作用的屈曲破坏模式,它们是:(1)局部屈曲和截面屈服(LY)的相互作用; (2)局部屈曲和全局屈曲(LG)的相互作用; (3)变形屈曲与截面屈服(DY)的相互作用; (4)扭曲屈曲与整体屈曲的相互作用; (5)局部屈曲,变形屈曲和截面屈服(LDY或DLY)的相互作用; (6)局部,变形和整体屈曲(LDG)的相互作用。载荷-轴向位移曲线,挠度-轴向位移曲线,中跨截面不同位置的轴向应力的发展,沿柱长的破坏时的平面外位移以及沿截面的轴向应力分布提出了跨中断面的故障。通过载荷-轴向位移曲线上的转折点来检测局部屈曲和变形屈曲。失效时沿柱长的平面外位移用于说明柱的失效模式。通过有限元和当前设计方法研究了174个因相互作用屈曲破坏模式而失效的柱的极限强度和破坏模式。对于DY破坏模式下的圆柱极限强度,北美规范对美国钢铁协会(AISI)的冷弯钢结构构件设计的预测结果高于FEM模拟结果。无论哪种失效模式,美国铝设计手册(AA),直接强度法(DSM),欧洲规范(EN1999)和中国铝合金结构设计规范(GB50429)预测的极限强度均低于FEM模拟结果。遇到的列。 P-AA / P-FEA,P-EC9 / P-FEA和P-GB / P-FEA的平均值分别为0.81、0.79和0.74。 DSM可以精确预测整体屈曲(G),LG和DY失效模式。但是,对于由LY,DG,LDY和LDG破坏的列,当由DSM预测时,它们分别为LG,G,DY和LG。应该进一步研究DSM在具有不规则形状横截面的薄壁铝合金柱上的适用性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号