...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Risk >Commodity risk hedging through risk sharing: reengineering Islamic forwards
【24h】

Commodity risk hedging through risk sharing: reengineering Islamic forwards

机译:通过风险分担进行商品风险对冲:重新设计伊斯兰教徒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, we study the possibility of using Islamic forwards, which are commonly known as salam contracts, to hedge commodity risk, while respecting the principle of risk sharing. Results show that this can be achieved by considering a stochastic forward price. In addition, splitting the deal into many salam contracts that have the same characteristics with regard to size and delivery date almost removes the zero-sum structure of salam's payoffs. To compute the number of needed contracts, we use a Monte Carlo simulation. The estimated number is large and increases with price volatility. Nevertheless, when this volatility exceeds a certain threshold, keeping one contract becomes the optimal solution for risk sharing. The relatively large number of needed contracts renders the splitting impracticable. Therefore, it is reduced to a number that both parties of the deal can agree upon. Finally, this hedging strategy is only possible within a mutual risk-sharing arrangement, because the price in salam must be specified; otherwise, the contract is void.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了在尊重风险分担原则的同时,使用伊斯兰远期合约(即萨拉姆合同)对冲商品风险的可能性。结果表明,这可以通过考虑随机远期价格来实现。此外,将交易分成许多在大小和交货日期方面具有相同特征的萨拉姆合同,几乎消除了萨拉姆收益的零和结构。为了计算所需合同的数量,我们使用了蒙特卡洛模拟。估计数量很大,并且随着价格波动而增加。但是,当波动率超过某个阈值时,保持一份合同成为风险分担的最佳解决方案。所需合同数量相对较大,因此无法进行拆分。因此,交易双方都可以达成协议的数量减少了。最后,这种套期保值策略仅在相互风险分担的安排中可行,因为必须指定萨拉姆价格。否则,合同无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号