...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M. >Comm Daily® Notebook
【24h】

Comm Daily® Notebook

机译:CommDaily®笔记本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Intel miscalculated the “level of congestion” in the UHF band above Channel 37 in comments filednin the incentive auction proceeding, said NAB in an ex parte filing Thursday (http://bit.ly/13Yciuq). TMobilenlater used the same bad data in its own filings, said NAB. “The result inadvertently distorts thenbreadth of the challenge of repacking broadcasters." The inaccurate filings demonstrate “how little is commonlynunderstood about the task of relocating broadcasters who do not participate in the auction,” NABnsaid. In a study filed in docket 12-268 in March (http://bit.ly/WKg7Dl), Intel said 98 percent of TV marketsnhave three or fewer stations above Channel 37, which NAB said suggests that the 600 MHz band is muchnclearer than it really is. “More than one-third of all full power and Class A TV stations (602 out of 1702 stations)nin the UHF band are located above channel 37,” NAB said. Instead of basing its study on DMAs, Intelnused each station’s city of license as its market, leading to “nonsensical results,” according to NAB.n“The more appropriate approach would consider the effect of repacking through a DMA lens,” said NAB.nThe Intel study “considers Florida stations licensed to Leesburg and Melbourne to be in different marketsndespite the fact that the stations are located at the same transmitter site,” said NAB. The Intel study alsoncontained “the head-scratching conclusion that Fairbanks, Alaska, is the most congested TV market in thennation,” NAB said. Intel said in an email Friday that its study is “directly derived from the FCC's own databasenof broadcasters” and that it had discussions with NAB about the study before filing it that “generatednno objections to use of the same FCC city-aggregated data.” Intel also said it concedes in its filing thatn“rigorous analysis of adjacent market interference will be necessary” to create a working band plan. The data from the Intel study were referenced by T-Mobile in reply comments filed in 12-286 earlier this monthn(http://bit.ly/11GXoVg). “According to Intel’s analysis, in 59 percent of markets, there are no broadcastntelevision channels above Channel 37,” said T-Mobile in comments outlining its proposals for a 600 MHznbandplan. “Obviously, in those markets, 84 MHz can be made available without clearing or repacking anynbroadcasters at all,” said T-Mobile. T-Mobile did not comment. NAB said the record needed to be correctednso the communications industry and the commission can “work from the same page to properly analyzenand address the enormous challenge of repacking and relocating broadcasters.”
机译:NAB周四在一份单方面文件中表示,英特尔在奖励拍卖程序中的评论中误算了第37频道上方UHF频段的“拥挤程度”。(http://bit.ly/13Yciuq) NAB表示,TMobilenlater在自己的文件中使用了同样的不良数据。 NABn说:“结果无意中扭曲了重新包装广播公司的挑战的广度。”不准确的文件表明“对于不参加拍卖会的广播公司的重新安置的任务,人们通常了解得很少。” 3月(http://bit.ly/WKg7Dl),英特尔表示98%的电视市场在37频道上方拥有三个或更少的电视台,NAB表示600 MHz频段比实际情况更加清晰。 NAB说,UHF频段内的所有全功率和A类电视台(1702个电视台中的602个)都位于37频道上方。”而不是基于DMA研究,英特尔将每个电视台的执照城市作为其市场,从而导致NAB表示,“毫无意义的结果。” nB说,“更合适的方法将考虑通过DMA镜头重新包装的效果。”英特尔的研究“考虑到授权给Leesburg和Melbourne的佛罗里达州电台在不同的市场,尽管事实如此“这些电台位于同一发射机地点。” NAB说。英特尔的研究还得出了一个“令人头疼的结论,即阿拉斯加的费尔班克斯是当时市场上最拥挤的电视市场,” NAB说。英特尔周五在一封电子邮件中表示,其研究“直接来自FCC自己的广播公司数据库”,并且在提交该报告之前与NAB讨论了该研究,“没有反对使用相同的FCC城市汇总数据。”英特尔还表示,它在其文件中承认,“没有必要对相邻市场的干扰进行严格的分析”,以制定一个工作频段计划。 T-Mobile在本月初12-286提交的答复评论中引用了英特尔研究的数据n(http://bit.ly/11GXoVg)。 T-Mobile在概述其600 MHznbandplan提案的评论中说:“根据Intel的分析,在59%的市场中,没有高于37频道的广播电视频道。” T-Mobile表示:“显然,在那些市场中,无需清除或重新包装任何广播公司,就可以提供84 MHz。” T-Mobile没有发表评论。 NAB表示,需要更正记录,以便通信行业和委员会可以“在同一页面上进行适当的分析,并解决重新包装和重新安置广播公司的巨大挑战。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M. 》 |2013年第121期| 11-12| 共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号