...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >Comm Daily® Notebook
【24h】

Comm Daily® Notebook

机译:CommDaily®笔记本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This week’s net neutrality court decision is an “an open invitation to the FCC to clarify the importancernof telecommunications networks to future economic growth and opportunity for all Americans,” saidrnComputer & Communications Industry Association Vice President-Government Relations Cathy Sloan,writing in an op-ed for The Hill (http://bit.ly/1mczUoD). She said broadband access is now “the equivalentrnof basic telephone service for most Americans” when discussing the context of the case, which restsrnon the FCC classifying broadband as an information service rather than a Title II telecom service. Thernagency has kept regulations to a minimum where there’s sufficient competition, she said. “Where choicesrnare few and market failure occurs, end users will look to the FCC for some basic protections that are onlyrnpossible if the agency restores its own dormant statutory authority over access to critical underlying telecommunicationsrnnetworks,” Sloan said. “Otherwise Internet access providers will be free to block andrndiscriminate at will, prioritizing only those information services that are both willing and able to pay forrnspecial connectivity.”
机译:计算机与通讯产业协会政府关系副总裁凯茜·斯隆(Cathy Sloan)写道:本周的网络中立法院裁决是“向美国联邦通信委员会公开邀请,以澄清电信网络对所有美国人未来的经济增长和机会的重要性。” ed for the Hill(http://bit.ly/1mczUoD)。她说,在讨论案情时,宽带接入现在“对大多数美国人来说是同等的基本电话服务”,这取决于FCC将宽带分类为信息服务而不是Title II电信服务。她说,在有足够竞争的地方,Thernagency将法规保持在最低限度。斯隆说:“在很少有选择并且市场失灵的地方,最终用户将向FCC寻求一些基本保护,而这些保护只有在该机构恢复对关键基础电信网络的访问权的休眠状态时才是可能的。” “否则,互联网访问提供商将可以随意阻止和随意区分,仅优先考虑那些愿意并能够为特殊连接付费的信息服务。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M》 |2014年第12期|13-14|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号