...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >Technological artifice and the object-subject relationship
【24h】

Technological artifice and the object-subject relationship

机译:技术手段与客体关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Because we habitually project our potentialities upon technology, its response as a system leads to objectification, which is a logical consequence of technology's influence on being. This understanding is true not only for the beings that are evident as technological artifacts such as tools and machines, but also for ourselves. Since objectification describes the process by which something is rendered as an object, technology is acutely qualified as a system to achieve this result. It is by means of objects that a technological artifice has a bearing on being. Although it is commonly acknowledged that technology encumbers being and achieves this encumbrance by objectifying everything, it is less commonly acknowledged that it is by means of objectification that we have any hope of intensifying our subjectivity, which seems contradictory to technology's relationship to objectification. Nevertheless, there is no other opportunity for us to assert our being unless it is by means of objectification; that is, the presence and influence of objects reverts back to us thereby enabling us to define who we are and what we do. Because objects are meaningful due to their worldliness, the recognition and manipulation of this relationship indicates how they are meaningful to us.
机译:因为我们习惯性地将潜力投射在技术上,所以它作为系统的响应会导致客观化,这是技术对存在的影响的逻辑结果。这种理解不仅对于诸如工具和机器之类的技术工件显而易见的生物,而且对于我们自己也是如此。由于对象化描述了将某物渲染为对象的过程,因此技术非常有资格作为实现此结果的系统。技术手段是通过对象来实现的。尽管通常认为技术会通过使所有事物客观化而成为存在并实现这种负担,但鲜为人知的是,我们不希望通过客观化来增强我们的主观性,这似乎与技术与客观化的关系相矛盾。然而,除非通过客观化,否则我们没有其他机会主张自己的存在。也就是说,物体的存在和影响会归还给我们,从而使我们能够定义我们是谁和我们做什么。由于物体具有世俗性,因此它们是有意义的,因此对这种关系的认识和操纵表明了它们对我们的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号