首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Bridging fields: A comparative study of the presence of think tanks
【24h】

Bridging fields: A comparative study of the presence of think tanks

机译:桥接领域:对智库存在的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Think tanks have increased their presence globally as social actors and provide evidence-based research for the complex policymaking process. How they can best influence policymakers is a common topic of analysis. There is an equal increase in the research using them as an object of study and exploring their area of influence. Periodical rankings and studies, both academic and non-academic, have been devoted to the impact of think tanks on media and institutions, analysing their presence, and explaining how, and if, they become influential.Through bibliometric analysis, this article covers the number of publications focusing on the study of think tanks in the Web of Science database since 1985 (n = 2,162). Given the research nature of think tanks, this paper analyses the recurrence of terms which link them to their connection with universities and the media, together with the use of their experts and their advocacy attempts.The goal is to obtain what the most relevant contributions are in terms of geographical and research areas. The article also analyses the frequency of key words which link think tanks with other social actors.
机译:智库在全球范围内增加了他们作为社交行为者的存在,并为复杂的政策制定过程提供基于证据的研究。他们如何最好地影响政策制定者是一个分析的共同主题。使用它们作为研究对象的研究平等增加,并探索其影响领域。期刊排名和研究,学术和非学术,都致力于智库对媒体和机构的影响,分析他们的存在,并解释如何,以及它们变得有影响力的分析,本文涵盖了这个数字重点关注自1985年以来科学数据库网中智库研究的出版物(n = 2,162)。鉴于智库的研究性质,本文分析了将它们与大学和媒体联系的术语复发,以及使用他们的专家及其宣传企图。目标是获得最相关的贡献就地理和研究领域而言。本文还分析了与其他社交行为者联系的关键词的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号