...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >How institutional logics hamper innovation: The case of animal testing
【24h】

How institutional logics hamper innovation: The case of animal testing

机译:制度逻辑如何阻碍创新:动物试验的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For radical innovation to become successful the substitution of established practices are essential. Nevertheless, in the innovation literature novelty is often at the center and only little attention is paid to the influence of established technologies and underlying routines. This paper aims to contribute to this gap by increasing the understanding about the effect of persistence of established practices on the innovation process. We do this by using a framework that combines the Technological Innovation System approach with an analysis of the institutional logics reinforcing the established practice. The studied case concerns the innovation process to animal-free medicine development. Despite the fact that the substitution of animal tests is called for since the 1980s and animal free methods are available, animal tests are still being used in medicine development. This study shows that adding institutional logics to the innovation systems analysis creates a much better understanding of the speed and direction of radical innovation. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:为了使根本性创新成功,必须替换既定做法。然而,在创新文献中,新颖性通常处于中心地位,而很少关注已建立的技术和基本程序的影响。本文旨在通过加深对既定实践的持续性对创新过程的影响的理解,来弥补这一差距。为此,我们使用了将技术创新系统方法与对建立既有实践的制度逻辑进行分析相结合的框架。研究的案例涉及无动物药物开发的创新过程。尽管自1980年代以来就要求替代动物试验,并且可以使用无动物的方法,但动物试验仍在药物开发中使用。这项研究表明,将制度逻辑添加到创新系统分析中可以更好地理解根本创新的速度和方向。 (C)2017由Elsevier Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号