首页> 外文期刊>Teachers and Teaching >Where does time go? Teaching and time use from the perspective of teachers
【24h】

Where does time go? Teaching and time use from the perspective of teachers

机译:时间去哪儿了?从教师的角度讲授教学和时间使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the last three decades Swedish education has undergone radical decentralisation involving increased school autonomy. One aspect of this change is the gradual weakening of the state regulation of teaching time. Thus, Sweden is somewhat of an extreme in the EU. This is accentuated by a five-year experiment, where 900 compulsory schools were allowed more freedom in the allocation of school hours. Thirty teachers from three compulsory schools participating in the experiment were interviewed and team meetings observed during a two-year period. The article explores and analyses changes in time-distribution, classification and framing of the curricula and teachers' work in the three teams and their classes, and analyses teachers' experiences of the changes. A major trend towards weakened classification and framing was found. A majority of the teachers were positive to more flexible time use, teamwork and cross-disciplinary studies. However, despite the experiment a majority still felt inhibited by the national time schedule and too little time for development work. Variations between the three cases are discussed in terms of different team cultures. The school characterised by development-oriented culture had changed their work and teaching most.
机译:在过去的三十年中,瑞典的教育经历了彻底的权力下放,涉及到更多的学校自主权。这种变化的一方面是对教学时间状态调节的逐渐削弱。因此,瑞典在欧盟中有些极端。一项为期五年的实验进一步强调了这一点,在该实验中,允许900所义务学校在分配课时方面享有更多自由。在两年的时间内,采访了来自三所义务学校的30名教师,并观察了小组会议。本文探讨并分析了三个团队及其班级中课程和教师工作在时间分布,分类和框架方面的变化,并分析了教师的变化经历。发现了减弱分类和取景的主要趋势。大多数教师对更灵活的时间使用,团队合作和跨学科研究表示肯定。但是,尽管进行了实验,但大多数人仍然感到受国家时间表的限制,并且开发工作的时间太少。根据不同的团队文化讨论了三种情况之间的差异。以发展为导向的文化为特征的学校改变了他们的工作和教学方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号